• @ValueSubtracted @startrek
    Basically where I’m also at.

    Also, as someone noted in a Discord chat about it, “decades before” only gives you a small window between the start of the Kelvin universe and Trek '09, otherwise too far back and you’re making a Prime Timeline movie. So that’ll be interesting to see what they plan.

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      At this point the Kelvin timeline is just a handwavey excuse for recasting Kirk and crew of TOS and following movies. And a prequel to Kelvin is an excuse to recast those parts with younger actors.

      Personally, I could care less about new movies featuring the TOS characters. Star trek evolved past them 30 years ago, I wish Hollywood would realise that.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Kelvin broke the seal on recasting, as it were.

        If Discovery or SNW had been the first to recast Kirk, there would have been a revolt, but since Kelvin got us used to the idea people just kind of accept it.

        • Handles@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, it was Pandora’s recasting, and now all the Kirks and Spocks are loose on the world.

    • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I would take that with a grain of salt - it’s a general-purpose Hollywood outlet reporting what their sources told them, so there could be room for inaccuracies.

      They could also follow Simon Pegg’s contention that the Kelvin and Prime timelines could be different at any point in history (which I support).

    • VindictiveJudge@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There are actually differences in the Prime and Kelvin timelines that happened before Nero’s incursion. For instance, Kirk’s date of birth is off by several months. They tried to justify that afterwards by saying something about the event sending shockwaves through time to change things before it even happened or something like that. The real reason probably lies in that interview where JJ Abrams admitted he never liked Star Trek, but you could argue that the removal of various down-stream time travel events, like the events of “The City on the Edge of Forever” likely not happening in the modified timeline, could actually cause retroactive changes to the timeline.

      But anyway, the Kelvin timeline already diverges before the Kelvin-Narada thing, because reasons.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Another change is Enterprise being built on earth instead of in orbit.

        I’m almost entirely sure that choice was because JJ Abrams wanted that visual in his movie. Justifications to Trek nerds were an afterthought.