• snaggen@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes it is, but not in the way you hope. I live in a socialist country, but I’m still stunned about the level of the communist delusions people seems to have here.

      • Robaque@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Social democracy isn’t really socialist…

        Anyways it’s just good to know that FOSS is built upon anarchist principles (of course, this doesn’t mean every FOSS project is anarchist) and is a great example of free association in practice. It helps demystify anarchism and communism.

        Also what “delusions” are you talking about? Marxist-leninist ones?

        • snaggen@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          The desillusions people seems to have here is the same kind you have for religious people and moral, where the religious people claim that religion is what provides moral, and hence non-religious people cannot know right from wrong. It seems that in the same way, people in this discussion have defined that communism is the mechanism for being generous and being willing to contribute to society. Hence, all non-communist societies cannot exists, since nobody will build it. Basically, it is a very brainwashed take on communism, not based on anything existing but on some fantasy, especially since all practical attempts at communism seems to requires to strip people of all their freedoms.

          • Robaque@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            When you talk about communism, are you talking about marxist-leninist / socialist states, or communism the idea(l) itself? Also how familiar are you with anarchism?

            It seems that in the same way, people in this discussion have defined that communism is the mechanism for being generous and being willing to contribute to society.

            You’re not far off, but yes that is more or less all that “communism” is:

            a classless, stateless, humane society based on common ownership, follows the maxim “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

            There is no prescription for how this may be achieved or how it might operate. Marxist-leninists want to reach it with a vanguard party and a socialist state, and this reflects how they see revolution as an event. Anarcho-communists instead see revolution as a process, and praxis takes the form of grassroots movements, aiming to bring about the necessary social change, building systems of free association from the ground up.