• derritterauskanada@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They are getting worse and worse over the years. I used to like the designs, now they don’t really have any redeeming qualities to me. Garbage brand that took down a good era of American Car Development (90’s Chrysler).

        • rm2601@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s sad to see what’s come of them as a brand. There used to be that point of time when MB legitimately lived up to their name of offering the beyond the BEST or nothing.

          For the record, our '19 MY GLC300 is doing well at nearly 60k miles. It’s not as big a benchmark or something to write home about, but it’s been doing well. I believe that the X253 chassis GLC (2015-2022) got more solid later in its production run, and the X254 (2023-onward) is still relatively new but way more complicated with the digital everything interior and more of everything, in my opinion.

          • Oh_G_Steve@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            with MB you really have to do research on which engines you’re buying and how long into the development cycle it is. Every year MB has some models that are great but a lot of other models are really bad. You just have to buy the right one.

      • Oh_G_Steve@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Don’t sleep on the 2009-2015 era cars. the 6 Cyls on the W212 are pretty bullet proof.

          • zeroonetw@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I had the turbo 4 version of the W204 ‘12 MY. It was not a tank and developed engine porosity at 100k miles. I guess the 6 cylinders were better.

      • rm2601@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That I humbly disagree with. The W211 (2003-2009) was when QC started to pick back up, and the W212 (2010-2015.5) was as good as the W211 and only built up on the 211’s excellence. The W212 was and still is as solid and stout of a luxury mid-sized saloon as they came. The W213 isn’t bad, as it was still decent, but the W212 was the cream of the crop for modern E classes. There was a moment when MB started emphasizing quality again (the period being 2010-2019~ish), though they have gone back to cost-cutting and overcomplicating for the sake of modernizing.

    • Dazzling-Rooster2103@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s year after year also. It’s not just some unlucky sample data. Year after year they are consistently lower than rank 20.

    • Colddeck64@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      My 67,000 mile GLC had its engine blow. No compression in cylinder 1.

      15,000 repair… fuck Mercedes

      • One-Platypus3455@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s the main car that I’m referring to. The W206 C Class and new GLC seem to be the worst offenders!

    • purplebrown_updown@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Got a used one a few years ago with 60k miles. Battery issues, electronic issues, gear shift issues, faux leather tearing/melting in the sun. Not something I would get again.