• AnimeAlt44@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it weren’t for fuel economy regulations by the nagging government most families would buy Corvettes instead of Grand Highlander hybrids smh.

      • AnimeAlt44@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only as a cudgel against EVs. As a long time Prius fan and fan of hybrids in general, I remember how vehemently they hated it until they needed something to counter the EV wave.

        • waveradar@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If anyone drove a modern EV versus a modern hybrid, they’d never suggest a hybrid with a straight face. Hybrids are an absolute snooze to drive, loud comparatively, and about as refined as a mid century tractor

        • Twombls@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Evs also got this sub to love public transit too as a cudgel against EVs lmao. I guess it’s proof a rising tide lifts all ships.

          But the hybrid rhetoric here is hilarious.

          Before ev: “too complicated, too expensive, going to break”

          After ev push: “hybrids are the actual best option for everyone, complexity is good actually”

          • caustictoast@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            This sub should love public transport though. Less cars on the road means driving is more enjoyable, less accidents, safer roads, etc.

          • bhauertso@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Haha, you are so right. The amount of support for hybrids and public transit on this sub has never been so high. It’s hilarious.

      • Vandrel@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you bothered to click the link you’d see that they’re almost exactly even.

          • Nukedogger86@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Easier to do when the starting number is lower. 50% of 1m is easier than 50% of 100m (dramatic example only, not real numbers). I think the best number to use is the overall take rate of a BEV of the total sales. Example, fortune magazine posted an article 6 days ago about BEVs having a 9% take rate so far in 2023 in the US, and quick search shows about 7.3% take rate for 2022. Still a decent increase.

            That said, BEVs in some sectors are selling like hot cakes, others seem to a bit slower to sell, coming from the manufacturers.

            • Ok-Condition-8973@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              The truth is getting around faster than suckers are being born.

              That’s the real reason for the BEV slump and HEVs taking off.