• Snazzy21@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an owner of a 3rz-fe, it brings great joy to see Toyota still putting the 2.7 2TR-FE in new models (the 2TR-FE reused the block of the ancient 3RZ)

    • 5_Star_Slick@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do you get joy from Toyota still using a lousy 4-cylinder that gets the same MPG as their V6?

      • Snazzy21@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it’s closely related to the 3rz-fe in my first car. An engine that does nothing but serve me well, and was the best possible engine to learn semi-advanced skills doing maintenance on. The 2TR is continues that legacy, so I’ll root for it.

        Also it does get slightly better fuel economy than even the modern V6 GR engine.

    • KampretOfficial@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, the notorious 2TR-FE. Here in Indonesia the whole TR family of Toyota engines are notorious for chugging fuel.

      14 mpg from a 2.0L 1TR-FE on urban driving, 18 mpg on mixed highway/urban driving. The 2TR-FE is a little better thanks to its increased torque compared to the 1TR.

      • Yummy_Crayons91@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah power of a 4 cylinder, Fuel consumption of an 8 Cylinder.

        Reminds me of the Mitsubishi Astron variant fitted in older Monteros and Pajeros. Power of a 4 Cylinder, engine the size of a 6 Cylinder, and Fuel Consumption of an 8 Cylinder, Perfect engine!