• feurie@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who says they don’t have a good work environment? I’ve seen no proof in either direction.

    The Tesla workers weren’t the ones who called the strike. It was the union itself who randomly demanded a bargaining agreement when there seemed to be nothing wrong or missing from their workers’ employment.

    • manicdee33@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who says they don’t have a good work environment?

      Tesla does, by claiming their workers have better conditions than the union mandated minimums, while refusing to join the union agreements.

    • Tyr1326@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have consistently elevated counts of workplace accidents, by as much as a factor of ten compared to other automotive manufacturers. Theres also a pretty high number of environmental incidents which may also be hazardous to longterm health of employees. Its not just about getting a decent wage.

      • feurie@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This has nothing to do with their German factory. This is about workers in Sweden.

        And where’s your source that they have ten times as many accidents and have many environmental accidents detrimental to the workers’ health?

        • Tyr1326@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/tesla-gruenheide-arbeitsunfaelle-umwelt-100.html

          Ill admit I misremembered - its just 3x as many incidents. Still not good, especially as these are only the ones they had to report, where people died or were unable to work for more than three days. And while these numbers are for the german factory, the environment is the same. Same company, same lack of unionisation, same structure. So if the numbers are different, its not cause Tesla is a better place to work at in Sweden.

          The latter part of your question is weird though - I said theres more environmental incidents, which may have an effect on worker health. That was conjecture on my part and a reason why more protection (ie via unionisation) is important. If theres a leak in a tank full of paint, its an environmental hazard and a health hazard, even if workers arent immediately unable to work. Fumes arent great for lungs, liver, kidneys… And thats just one example of what could go wrong…

    • the_lamou@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they have good work environments and pay better than competitors with CBAs already, why not simply formalize it in a CBA? An agreement is just a baseline. It doesn’t set a top, only a bottom, and if you’re already above the bottom then it won’t affect you as a company in the least.