I overclocked my steam deck, and now it runs at a 90% locked 30 fps in new Atlantis.

So, I’d say within the next update and maybe Proton update, we can see it improve heavily.

  • lovelyhead1@alien.top
    cake
    B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Starfield is kind of bad. Terrible story, constant loading screens, barren worlds, the list goes on. Not really worth going to the hassle of getting it working on Steam Deck in my opinion.

    • AztecScribe@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bar the Steam Deck part that what everyone said about Fallout 4, even I did at release! But now I find myself playing it again and again.

      My concern with Starfield though is that Fallout is made playable largely due to its fantastic world space which has so much to discover but perhaps Starfield lacks this.

      I’m definitely not rushing to buy it. Will probably wait for it to be 25€ and have a few overhauls available.

      • SecretInfluencer@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s because people criticized Fallout 4 as an RPG. Now people are playing it as a looter shooter, ignoring the main story, and wondering why people hated it.

        As an RPG it’s terrible. As a looter shooter it’s enjoyable. Those who approached it as the second enjoyed it more and called those that tried it out as an RPG “stupid”.

        Plus the story isn’t good. The lead writer said he didn’t put effort into the story because “we can write the best story and they’ll make paper airplanes out of it.” While I can understand not making it a priority, not giving much thought into it because some people won’t pay attention is a shot in the face to those that would.

      • Afinda@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Starfield, or other Bethesda type Games, are really “YMMV”.

        Colleague of mine still plays it, while i dropped it after some 50’ish hours and having played the crimson raiders arc. At first i had a lot of fun exploring planets for that tasty EXP and getting a Build going.

        Now i can Streamroll pretty much everything (Solo build, so no companions) and am fairly high level. Too high level (47 i think?) that Side-Quests with their 100 EXP Reward simply aren’t worth doing when i can get that per enemy on the level 70+ worlds easily without much of a fight.

        (Been playing on PC though, for me it ain’t worth it to force myself to play it on Deck but i would’ve if i didn’t have any other means).

        The other thing that eventually sets in: You keep repeating the same-ish loop of Exploration which can get old really fast if there’s long streches without any combat or worthwhile lore advancement. Once you begin to see repeats of certain locations and figure out that permanent upgrade magazines usually only spawn in unique locations (which you can see from orbit view after scanning)…

        It’s just not worth it anymore at some point.

      • Bastiwen@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t like Fallout 4 on release and still think it’s the worst 3D Fallout (if we exclude 76 which I only played for a couple of hours). BUT, after a bit I started really enjoying it for what it was even if there’s still things I don’t like.

        Starfield on the other hand… Oh boy. I played nearly a hundred hours up until I was on NG+2 just to see if I didn’t get it, expecting it to eventually become good.
        It never did. Don’t get me wrong, I had my fair share of fun moments while playing, the combat for exemple I dinf pretty neat, like a better version of F4. The space ships are also pretty cool even though they ultimately don’t really serve a purpose. Some quests were also god.

        But man, is the game bland and devoid of charm. It’s not optimized, the story is boring, the facial animations are still outdated and uncanny, there’s ZERO reason to explore which is what I’ve always enjoyed in Bethesda games, it’s not a pretty game except for some interior environments (That pretty much all look like a better version of the Institute from F4).

        A lot of people have used the phrase “As vast as an ocean, as deep as a puddle” over the years and I feel like it fits Starfield the most. I had the misfortune of buying the premium edition so I’ll probably play through the DLC and uninstall the game again. Until then, I have no desire to ever play this game again.<

        All of this is just my opinion btw, I don’t hate people for enjoying the game, it’s jsut not a good Bethesda game to me, or a good game period.

      • chibicascade2@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m enjoying playing it on game pass and streaming it to the deck, but I wouldn’t buy it. Doubt I’ll even buy another month of game pass to finish the game if it cuts me off early.

    • Bradjuju2@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I played about 150 hours on deck. I gave up waiting for news on optimization because the game isn’t great. It falls into the “forgettable” category.

    • Skitty_Skittle@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Go to the starfield subreddit, it’s very odd….

      Posts range from, “This game is the second coming of Christ” then proceeds to show a generic barren world with a moon as the screen shot as proof. Then you get the, “This game is fantastic! But it’s actually fucking shit based off the never ending issues BUT because it’s Bethesda it’s OK!” Posts.

    • nagarz@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To add to this, I played Starfield on my desktop at 4K60fps mostly stable framerates aside a couple stutters on new atlantis and aquila city.

      Mostly the game is average (6/10 imo) and doesn’t to anything better than other bethesda games from the last 10 years or so, but with the caveat that there’s barely any mods that do much yet (creator kit for starfield is not out yet), so you won’t see much aside some UI, texture and clothes changes, and don’t get me wrong, there’s a bunch of UI issues that are terrible on the base game, but overall the game experience doesn’t change.

      Honestly the only thing I felt refreshing from starfield compared to other bethesda games are ship related activities, but the main problem with that is that it’s super limited in scope, which is unsurprising considering it’s the first time they’ve done ships, but aside that, quests, story, NPCs, etc, are pretty much just a shuffle from their other games, so if you want another new bethesda game that is similar to old ones, starfield will be ok, if you want a next gen game from bethesda, this aint it.

      Once creator kit for it is available (looks like somewhen 2024) and modders begin pumping out shit this will probably change a lot and the game will become way more popular, but I wouldn’t spend much effort tweaking my steamdeck for it, there’s a lot of better games out there honestly.