Chelsea’s best performances were against Liverpool, Arsenal, Spurs and Man City but usually when they’ve come against a lesser team that’s going to be more defensive and less full on attack they’ve struggled such as West Ham, Brentford, Villa and Newcastle

  • Billoo77@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone taking OPs words too literally.

    Chelsea have performed better against top teams compared to worse opponents.

    • Ninjameerkat212@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But they’re not worse opponents if they’re beating Chelsea. You can read whatever stats you want or look at how much has been spent, what matters is the result on the pitch. If a team, no matter where they are in the table beats another team, they were better than that team because they won and winning is what the game is about.

  • badassery11@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well you’re right, they definitely struggled against Tottenham, needing about 852 chances before they finally scored

    • GMD3S1GNS@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One season, the top 6 have more power and influence than Newcastle will ever have

    • Meth_Hardy@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because of the owners. Haven’t you heard? It’s nothing to do with a manager refusing to drop his favourite player despite him being in awful form for nearly a year.

    • GMD3S1GNS@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the players aren’t good enough, we make sacrifices to get results which teams like Chelsea do not

      • Icarus07c@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You have players who either would shine at other teams, have recently shined for other teams or have gone on to shine for other teams, the problem isn’t the players

  • bearrock80@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Newcastle is in UCL, how are they a lesser team? With that said, today’s performance was a different flavor than the losses against low block sides. In those games, Chelsea outplayed the opposition, but couldn’t finish and got punished on counters. Today, they were ran off the field and collectively had their worst performance in a long time. Terrible performance by almost everyone today for Chelsea

  • fade_to_unity@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because Chelsea is also a lesser club that gets the usual giant-killing mentality when facing the big teams? :> (trying to match the vibe…)

  • richardpickles69@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I were a Chelsea fan right now I wouldn’t be calling Newcastle a “lesser team.” Villa either really. Both squads are better, and both are playing better. Both also have loads of money and good managers and don’t seem to be going away any time soon.

  • Daver7692@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Smaller teams tend to play a low block which Chelsea have time and again proven they have nothing to get past.

    Bigger teams generally play more attacking, with higher lines, which is generally more favourable for the few attacking strengths Chelsea have.

    Another reason that Ange deciding to just stick with a high line against them is more perplexing. The probably could have gotten a point or better had they adapted post red card, instead of”sticking to his principles” wasn’t giving them the best chance of a result in the game.

  • NDdownVOTED@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We have trouble with teams that park the bus because we dont have a prolific striker, but that’s not really what happened today. Caicedo not starting after international duty caused the first goal but in general we just didn’t look up for today for some reason.

  • no1jj48fan@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dunno where you got “less full on attack” from, that’s pretty clearly not Newcastle’s game.