It’s an interesting one and maybe not as straightforward on first thought, are you judging on silverware? League position, how the players performed under them?
Because essentially they’ve all been sacked and left the club ok not the best terms and we have Ten Hag who we’ll see about. But as far as success, player performance despite what you may think of him, it’s gotta be Mourinho hasn’t it? Ten Hag hasn’t got a clue what his style of play is and is just as bad a man manager as modern mourinho so it’s up in the air to me.
Who would you say has been the best?
Moyes was underwhelming totally, van gaal brought in youth and had us looking ok with a cup win and was prematurely let go unless there was some agreement behind the scenes. The football could have been better but he was starting something, mourinho then built on his foundation and did a few bits here or there but the football between them was quite negative in my eyes. Ole refreshed all that for me it was genuinely like watching United of old I always felt we had a chance of winning a game then came the ronaldo signing which completely undermined everything ole was building. It’s a hard choice but it’s ole for me we seemed to be more exciting despite not winning anything, ten hag could be it only time will tell he’s got great resilience I’ll give him that
Out of interest, even though I know hindsight is a wonderful thing, looking back now would you still have taken Ronaldo back at Utd?