I think both clubs are in disarray in their own ways. Both have great managers but not idea players. United have good players on paper but who seem to have really poor attitudes and undermine the manager eventually.
Chelsea have spent a lot of money but have a completely new squad who have had little time together and are very raw.
It’s easy to say “Chelsea should because they spent 1bn”. But I am talking about their current squads, manager, board, situation etc
I disagree with you saying that ETH is not a good manager. The United issues are deep rooted in the club and it’s beyond the manager.
I definitely agree with the second part. The whole club lacks a strategy and identity and it has been going on for years.
But I have seen nothing in ETH to suggest is a ‘very good’ manager. Performing at Ajax doesn’t count - we had Frank De Boer who had done that.