I think both clubs are in disarray in their own ways. Both have great managers but not idea players. United have good players on paper but who seem to have really poor attitudes and undermine the manager eventually.
Chelsea have spent a lot of money but have a completely new squad who have had little time together and are very raw.
It’s easy to say “Chelsea should because they spent 1bn”. But I am talking about their current squads, manager, board, situation etc
I love the Premmy but I have to say. It’s going to be Luton. They are due, law of averages innit! When Leicester won the Barclay Card people said impossible. When Tottenham Forrest won the euros same. I know y’all think I’m saying Luton because I’m from London England, but I’m from Manchester Utd.
Chelsea as much of a joke as they have been they are a newly combined team with a very young squad, they’re beginning to gel and you can see that by their recent results.
Personally as a Newcastle fan I wish we’d played them 5-6 weeks ago rather than in two weeks time as I’m genuinely worried.
We tend to do well against top teams so expect a high-goal thriller at St James’ Park.
Nah New castle is going to beat us pretty convincingly. We can’t break down low blocks and they are probably the best low block in the league if not world. They don’t always play in a low block so if they decide to come out, we have a chance otherwise we’re finished
Depends how many of our players come back from injury over the break. Id feel confident in a fully fit Newcastle, our squad as it stands however is being held together by sellotape and a prayer! 😂
here before 1-1 draw
Chealea, out of the 2. all they really need is a striker who can actually put it away and they have a solid team in a season or 2. Man U need a lot more than 1 player, plus I don’t think ETH is that great
I see you never watched Chelsea play in the last couple of weeks when you decided to write this bullshit.
Chelsea
Enrico Chiesa, as a Man U player
In the short term Chelsea looks more likely but longer term United. I think the contracts Chelsea have handed out could come back to bite them if they are unable to move on players that they need to.
Honestly it will probably be newcastle
Neither
Chelsea, they look worse, but their problems are more short term than long term.
If you asked this a month ago people would say Man U, because chelsea have put up two good performances now all of a sudden people think they are through the shit. Chelsea are still in a bad place.
I see your point, but United haven’t put in more than 20 good minutes at a time this season, nevermind an entire performance
Both teams are terrible rn don’t get me wrong. But Man U Are still Man U and new ownership could change things. Neither of them are winning it any time soon so that’s good.
Man u are still man u, lol! Love this comment! Sounds intelligent but completely ignorant
Manchester City. Nobody else will ever win the league again
bro has never looked into the history of the league. liverpool were more dominant than city have been around the 70’s, manchester united similarly in the 90’s/ early noughties before chelsea started competing for the title.
Wolves
Chelsea because they’re actively trying to get their shit together, United are just shit
chelsea team is really young and they will get better.I think they will have the second best midfield in the world in 2-3years(real madrid is just too good in that area) all chelsea needs is a good striker.United needs big changes and recent transfers they made are really unlucky i dont think they can win anything anytime soon