• portal23@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Emery is a phenomenal manager and all these discussions below about what Pep would have done with Aston Villa or where Emery would have been with City are completely pointless since they are based on “What ifs” and nothing more.

    Before Haaland came to the PL people here were discussing how he won’t adapt fast enough to the tough Premier League and that he didn’t fit Citys playstyle at all etc. well he arrived and scored the most goals ever in a Premier League season and won nearly everything there is with City

    • Theplowking23@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dont buy into the over the top pep circlejerk man. Hes not doing anything Rinus Michels or Cruyff didnt do before him in terms of football philosophy

      • Snoo_72181@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pep made Rinus Michels or Cruyff’s work better and more suitable for the modern game, which is more tactical, physical and faster.

      • MainIll2938@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think he cares. Trophies matter. Besides many coaches copy him like currently with inverted fullbacks and no one can doubt that he has a knack of improving most players.

    • KoolDiscoDan@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Emery is a phenomenal manager and all these discussions below about what Pep would have done with Aston Villa or where Emery would have been with City are completely pointless since they are based on “What ifs” and nothing more.

      Okay, what would have Emery done at Arsenal?

        • KoolDiscoDan@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ha! You think that would matter? Look at what Emery did with Torreira. He tried to take a really good deep-lying midfielder with 4 goals in 77 appearances and make him a goal scoring threat. When it didn’t work, he ghosted him. He had Aubameyang, Ozil, Lacazette, Leno, Cech. Hardly an EFL Championship team.

          • you-will-never-win@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s 2 keepers, both Arsenal have since deemed not good enough and 3 players who I’ve seen far more criticisms than praise in their last seasons from Arsenal fans

      • seeyoujim@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only arsenal fans would agree with this. Alone this summer:

        Handling of ramsdale and raya : highly questionable Not buying a striker of proven pedigree: very questionable. Not buying another centre half: when a lack of decent back ups in this position in particular cost you the league title: madness. Before I’m corrected on timber being bought, yes, he’s a some time centre half but you need 4 decent options to challenge in reality and arsenal only really had 2 before.

        Last year the whole squads lack of depth exposed them as the season wore on and really he only really replaced those allowed to move on for the most part and then £40m on a goalie when that was the least needed part of the puzzle. Just really quite odd.

        Couple that with the klopp levels of not being able to accept blame for a bad result? Well I think you’ll struggle to find non arsenal fans with sympathy

    • EvasiveUsernam3@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      99% of people knew Haaland was going to score tons of goals the moment City signed him. That also has nothing to do with Emery.