Why should be a problem. From a sporting point of view one wants to play for United the other one want to leave. If you talk about personal life, if a person was legally found not guilty who am i or you to question that without knowing all the facts. Ronaldo was accused of rape and there was no backlash no suspension. And many others. Many PL teams didn’t even suspended players while they were investigated, Liverpool included.
Stop lying. Flanagan was accused of assaulting his girlfriend while at Liverpool and he was cut immediately.
Lmao just admit you don’t mind abusers and women beaters as long as they play for your team and keep it at that.
Greenwood was never charged because the gf dropped the charges not because he wasn’t guilty of anything.
But then again, I would expect someone defending women abusers to try and use the “he wasn’t charged” argument.
Flanagan wasn’t even a starter for Liverpool at the time so they couldn’t even drop him, also Liverpool didn’t even get rid when he was found guilty and continued to pay him for the rest of the season! Do you get things wrong on purpose?
United didn’t seem to have a problem doing that for Greenwood…… hmmmmm
I guess the difference is they thought they could just wait out his outrage and then have him back
All the united fans downvoting
Why should be a problem. From a sporting point of view one wants to play for United the other one want to leave. If you talk about personal life, if a person was legally found not guilty who am i or you to question that without knowing all the facts. Ronaldo was accused of rape and there was no backlash no suspension. And many others. Many PL teams didn’t even suspended players while they were investigated, Liverpool included.
Stop lying. Flanagan was accused of assaulting his girlfriend while at Liverpool and he was cut immediately. Lmao just admit you don’t mind abusers and women beaters as long as they play for your team and keep it at that. Greenwood was never charged because the gf dropped the charges not because he wasn’t guilty of anything. But then again, I would expect someone defending women abusers to try and use the “he wasn’t charged” argument.
Seriously mate?
Flanagan wasn’t even a starter for Liverpool at the time so they couldn’t even drop him, also Liverpool didn’t even get rid when he was found guilty and continued to pay him for the rest of the season! Do you get things wrong on purpose?