Man United had a very similar one last year where it bounced of Martinez’s thigh and hit his hand. We had two handball penalties in our last Champions league match, after the match some fans got talking to the ref and he told them that they wouldn’t have been penalties in the premier League but are under UEFA rules they are.

It’s a shit rule not shit refereeing.

The premier league is more than the 20 teams in the league, it’s a business and brand in itself. The other 19 teams definitely will want city punished but the premier League as a business and brand won’t. It’s not because city are special above everyone else but having the team that has dominated the league over the last century shown to have been cheating in order to achieve it will damage the brand. If the premier league really cares about fair play then they would never have let state ownership happen. However they don’t, they care about money and making the league the biggest in the world. So they will try to let city go unpunished, it’s not like these accusations were not obvious to everyone when they happening same as the Chelsea ones.

Yes but the premier League don’t really want to punish City, so they will just say no evidence was found so no punishment

City will not get punished because again they will not give up evidence freely and stonewall the premier League every step of the way and it will pay off. Everton were punished because they didn’t hide it, Chelsea might be punished because they went to the premier League with evidence. Clubs will all catch on soon that it’s better to hide your wrong doing and not be honest.

Barcelona loves a side hustle

And why he was snapped up by the mighty Al-Ettifaq to manage in the greatest league on earth, check and mate Gerrard doubters.

Also everyone knew Villa were a good team being pulled down by Steven Gerrard but Carragher isn’t going to criticise his mate.

Seriously mate?

Flanagan wasn’t even a starter for Liverpool at the time so they couldn’t even drop him, also Liverpool didn’t even get rid when he was found guilty and continued to pay him for the rest of the season! Do you get things wrong on purpose?

Why should united pay his wages while he plays for another club? If he wants a career revival he can take a drop in wages or apologise to the manager.

I mean Sancho has already turned down a move to Saudi at the start of the season so I think it’s unlikely for him.

You need two things to succeed, good management and money.

Teams like Chelsea and Man United have money but bad management.

Teams like Brighton have good Management but no money.

City have good management and money

Your current squad costs 5m less than Man United’s so wouldn’t say you spend a lot less!

Crazy Maguire is still up there seeing as he was mainly a sub last year.

We all hate Newcastle’s owners but this article is trash, reading the article you find he hasn’t indicated anything at all. Literally said they can make whatever assumptions they like and the journalist ran with it. Clickbait at its finest!

Like how City and Newcastle played on Tuesday so play Sunday, and Man United, Liverpool and Arsenal played Wednesday so play Saturday?

I don’t think it’s embarrassing