Factoring in both short and long term capabilites, which club is less equiped for success? They’re both well under expectations at the moment, but who is more likely to be good in a 2-5 year window?
Factoring in both short and long term capabilites, which club is less equiped for success? They’re both well under expectations at the moment, but who is more likely to be good in a 2-5 year window?
It’s like asking if shitting bcoz of diarrhea is better or incoming poo from another stomach disorder is worse.
Chelsea’s arrogant owners (8 yr contracts & other bad decisions despite being given contrary advice), are leading the club to a future shit condition, one that ManU is already in and doesn’t show signs of improving.
So, in essence, both of them will be shitting horrendously in the future. Thus OP’s question can be rephrased as “who would you rather be right now”?
To which, the answer is clearly Chelsea.