Factoring in both short and long term capabilites, which club is less equiped for success? They’re both well under expectations at the moment, but who is more likely to be good in a 2-5 year window?

  • T3TeddY-221@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man United obviously, just look back at the players these two clubs signed, It will make you feel that the new players of Man United makes you unable to see any hope of getting better. Except for Casemiro, there is no signing that you feel is worth it. Antony for 100 million, Højlund for 85 million and we need Mount for? Chelsea spent the same amount of money to buy Enzo and we only have Antony?

    Sorry, I’m really pessimistic right now, but this is indeed affected by the current situation.