Factoring in both short and long term capabilites, which club is less equiped for success? They’re both well under expectations at the moment, but who is more likely to be good in a 2-5 year window?
Factoring in both short and long term capabilites, which club is less equiped for success? They’re both well under expectations at the moment, but who is more likely to be good in a 2-5 year window?
From a fan of neither, I feel like United are rotten to the core with a horrific, toxic overall club mindset that no one can save.
Chelsea on the other hand, have nothing. As bad as they’re doing they’re still a fairly clean slate without the 10 years of trauma like United.
I feel like one good managerial appointment or signing (striker probably) could swing their fortunes drastically.
Maybe I’m wrong though.
I dno. A billion spent in a season? They’re a FFP implosion waiting to happen
Learn the rules of FFP
Financial Fair Play or Financial Farce Play
FFP such a joke
You don’t know shit either
You aren’t wrong. Our main problem has been missing chances
It’s not about “club mindset” it’s about ownership and the media circus who is obsessed with United because whatever they say - good or bad about United - sells papers and generates clicks. It creates a really crazy environment of scrutiny that no other club in England faces.
Imagine if United had 115 charges like City do. It would be in the paper, talked about on talksport and in online articles every day.