Bruno came in and became their creative outlet when club was in crisis. He can score, assist, and does so much of out of possession. Yes, he might not be natural leader like Vidic, Rio, etc but he’s better leader than other players in the squad. Why does he got so much criticism for?

I think he’s perfect United player. He has that United DNA; doing everything to get in refs mind and change the outcome of the game just like old days with Fergie, always complaining, taking responsibility of penalty duty, never get injured, and he’s consistently ‘aggressive chance creator’. Why would any fanbase want to get rid of player with rare talents like Bruno.

  • RubenLaporteZ@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I dont get the hatred for him, hes passionate and a good player, Id rather someone whose a whingers than someone who doesnt care

  • AlternativeRun5727@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Moans, whines, throws tantrums, and loses the ball at an incredibly high rate for a midfielder. The top 20 club teams in the world, the ones with aspirations of winning the Champions League wouldn’t start him.

  • j_j_footy@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It come down to wins and losses. If united were winning and at or near top of the league nobody would be saying a thing bad about him. In fact he would be praised for his passionate leadership. Since they are not, everyone piles on.

  • stoneman9284@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think anyone questions his talent. Just his attitude, leadership, etc. He’s a whiny little bitch and plenty of great players have been exactly that, but it doesn’t mean I have to like his antics or want him on my team

    • Spiritualcomp@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There are massive question marks over his talent.

      Given he’s arguably the worst big game player in the sports history and was so even during his first season of good form.

      Is the mark of a good player the one that punishes the mistakes of poor players the most or how well they perform against the best?