It seems to me like one of those decisions where 50% of VAR teams would give the penalty and 50% would overturn it. How do you fairly judge a situation like that?
It seems to me like one of those decisions where 50% of VAR teams would give the penalty and 50% would overturn it. How do you fairly judge a situation like that?
If they use VAR to retroactively assign red cards to players who obviously dove or committed other types of fakery, then these occurrences of questionable embellishment will reduce significantly cos less players will want to risk a 3 game ban and the reputation label.