Prominent Republicans are trying to fight "bias" online.
  • CommunistEnglish
    61·
    5 个月前

    This is to stop a cyberbullying campaign against a disabled person

    That kind of censorship doesn’t sit will with me. What else are they keeping from us?

    probably other things to harrass individuals with?

    • humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.suEnglish
      14·
      5 个月前

      Yeah, no.

      It’s still censorship even if the person in question wants it to be censored.

      People shouldn’t get to dictate whether or not wikipedia articles are made of them.

      • CommunistEnglish
        11·
        5 个月前

        If I made a wikipedia page showing your social security and banking information would your stance hold true?

          • CommunistEnglish
            11·
            5 个月前

            for the same reason they don’t give resources to blatant harassment campaigns.

            both are against the rules and both are censorship for nearly identical reasons

              • CommunistEnglish
                11·
                5 个月前

                My point was that censorship is valid when it is to prevent harming individuals/fraud/bullying

                my goalpost did not move at all.

                you are being a hypocrite by saying it was okay not to have that on wikipedia because it was already banned

                you should oppose that ban on the basis of censorship, no?