“This is merely a prediction of what an advanced country that might implement communism sometime in the future, as in, is not currency communist, but might be someday looks like”
In other words, marx is not describing a communist country, he’s describing the prerequisites he believes there are for a communist country.
is a better version of that sentence.
You’ll notice one of them even says “in the hands of the state” but it is well known that there is no state in communism… the state must wither away, and communism is the end point, therefore there is no state in communism.
I… just explained that I was not in fact called on a falsehood, you just misunderstood my writing.
I even explained how it was obviously true, you’re just ignoring it. How could that be an implementation of communism if it includes a state??
I understand now why your co-moderator is unwilling to moderate with you and just gave me sympathy, you can’t argue, or possibly, can only argue in bad faith.
Anybody else reading this will come to the conclusion that you’re being intentionally obtuse.
That is not a change, you misinterpreted me.
“This is merely a prediction of what an advanced country that might implement communism sometime in the future, as in, is not currency communist, but might be someday looks like”
In other words, marx is not describing a communist country, he’s describing the prerequisites he believes there are for a communist country.
is a better version of that sentence.
You’ll notice one of them even says “in the hands of the state” but it is well known that there is no state in communism… the state must wither away, and communism is the end point, therefore there is no state in communism.
I’m not interested in arguing with you and never will be. You’ve been called out on a falsehood, and you’re unable to man up to it.
I… just explained that I was not in fact called on a falsehood, you just misunderstood my writing.
I even explained how it was obviously true, you’re just ignoring it. How could that be an implementation of communism if it includes a state??
I understand now why your co-moderator is unwilling to moderate with you and just gave me sympathy, you can’t argue, or possibly, can only argue in bad faith.
Anybody else reading this will come to the conclusion that you’re being intentionally obtuse.
I told you I’m not interested in arguing, and you still want to argue. When someone asks you to stop, you stop.
Your ban will last 48 hours