The moment you define human experience or human consciousness through language is the moment you open the door to emergent properties for that very experience or consciousness. Learning through science that we think or that we act a certain way deterministically is also giving us the means to self-correct or condition ourselves to act or to have a different viewpoint. This is the difference between us and machines: we collectively defined the perimeters of our experiences (phenomenologically or through a science-based approach) and therefore anything that changes that perimeter also changes the context of the human experience in an infinitely recursive way.

We also use language in ways that make us able to collectively conceptualize the world and its phenomenas, although we individually interpret words differently, idiosyncratically from our individual experience and value systems. This is something else that differentiate us from machines: we don’t need the outputs and inputs to be mathematically the same to minimally understand each other. Our way to communicate, although imperfect and imprecise, has made us able to cooperate on a higher level than any other species (as of known) despite those epistemological hurdles.

I would posit that LLMs have no such emergent capabilities, as they’re bound by their training datasets and limited by their model’s parameters. The burden of proof for those emergent properties are on the data scientists, and as of yet I have seen no such proof.

Fighting what’s left of the workweek before I can celebrate with the Friday evening DND game.

Justin était bon pour faire des promesses (le scrutin proportionnel, de kessé?) et pour dépenser. J’en connais une couple de gars comme ça, super sympathiques et agréables, sauf quand vient le temps de réparer les pots cassés laissés derrière eux. Je préfère pas Carney. Ça ferait du bien si le NPD pouvait rentrer, même si je suis plutôt souverainiste. À date, Avi Lewis a l’air pas si mal.

Ça va être tellement abusé par le corps policier. C’est quoi la définition d’une insulte?

City councillor Carla Beauvais heavily criticized the administration for not providing clear definitions. She also questioned the lack of public consultations. “A threat can be proven. An offensive word is felt. And how a person feels can vary from one person to another. So where does the offence begin? Where does permissible anger end? The text doesn’t say,” said Beauvais.

She cited various decisions from the Quebec City municipal court in which judges could not agree on what constitutes an insult, raising concerns that the rule will cause a backlog at the courthouse.

Encore plus de raisons d’être stressé.e inutilement par la présence policière. C’était tellement l’enjeu qu’il fait réglér en priorité, tsé. Et le racisme systémique des agents de police? Aucune enquête du Bureau d’enquête indépendant qui a mené à des poursuites? La police qui attaque des journalistes lors des manifestations?

Je suis cynique, mais Soraya voulait le corps policier de son bord. Voilà, un peu de clientélisme et on passe au prochain dossier.

A homes first initiative with needs based assistance can work. in 2013 a study in Toronto was shown that the city spends on average 75K a year PER homeless individual. this included shelter costs, medical, and other resources. that’s 75K per person in YOUR tax dollars that went towards not solving anything. Providing housing + assistance would be massively cheaper in the long run.

We had a similar study done in Quebec : https://www.lapresse.ca/affaires/chroniques/2026-07-16/etude-du-cirano/chaque-personne-itinerante-coute-77-600-par-annee.php

But often, that doesn’t work with the mentality that these people don’t “deserve” the help. So much for the “pragmatism” the same crowd argue for against the empathy and compassion that everyone deserves.