• 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 24 days ago
cake
Cake day: September 25th, 2026

help-circle




  • Honestly I’m leaning more and more towards advocating for people to use AI responsibly instead of outright rejecting it.

    Yes the environmental impact is insane, but I feel like that’s mostly because they keep pushing it to do more and more. But I think we’re well past the sweet spot of what work AI should take off our shoulders. Remove too much and you end up with Meat Proxies.

    Tho that only applies to things where only the result matters, like code. Pragmatic stuff, that’s there to serve a specific purpose.

    Art is the exact opposite. The process matters, the struggles, the successes, the setbacks. It’s a thing of passion, and that can never be truly replaced by a machine.



  • deadalus@discuss.tchncs.detoFuck AI@lemmy.world•Fuck Linus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly, I think it can be helpful for beginners if used in moderation.

    I’m a complete beginner with programming, and yesterday was working on my home assistant to control both my AC and Radiator simultaneously. But I couldn’t get it to work, with the special climate entity always crashing. After i think 2 hours, I asked Gemini what was wrong, and it pointed out that I didn’t have a fallback value and that when starting up, the values were invalid, and caused the entity to crash. After I added a fallback, it worked.

    I think AI can be useful if you treat it like asking someone more experienced like a teacher. It will make mistakes, but if you’re stuck it might be able to help you. I’m still writing my code myself, but I use Gemini as a last resort when I’ve spend over an hour on a problem and can’t figure it out myself.

    Not that that applies to Linus, but I thought I’d also add some context from a beginner









  • This isn’t about small companies with a handful of people, it’s about the ones with thousands of employees. And being a freelancer basically means not having anyone beneath you.

    The whole point is about the massive amount of surplus value the employer takes off the employee. In small companies, due to a lack of machines, experience, connections in the industry and other things, there needs to be more work done for the same profit. So the employers will have to work themselves to rival other major corporations.

    You shouldn’t see these type of things as a critique on the person, but on the system. You have to exploit your workers, otherwise you won’t be able to compete with the ones that do.

    If you are a fair boss, and you give your employees the actual value of their work, you don’t have any to invest, and will eventually fall behind on technology. So the more someone exploits others, the more they’re able to invest in tech, therefore increasing their workers productivity, and the amount of money they can extract.

    The owner of a major company has to be a major exploiter, otherwise they wouldn’t be where they are.

    That’s why the problem is the system, not the person