Where are you seeing performance issues? As your issue might be less with your CPU and more with storage or some other bottleneck.

Did you mean an i5-8400 instead? As there is no i5-8700 - that’s an i7, which would have the same number of cores as the 9700.

The i5-8400 would be fine for most IT homelabs; there are some specific applications that really need more power than that (especially any of the Cisco bits from what I’ve heard, but I have no first-hand experience with those).

What exactly are you planning on doing with the homelab?

For HP, you’ll see a model like an HP Elitedesk mini 800 G4, for instance. Elitedesk will either come in a 705 or 800 - this is just AMD or Intel. Prodesk will come in 400s or 600s - this is mostly chassis and cooling for differences, with anything ending in a 5 being an AMD model. The “G4” part is the HP generation number. A G4 corresponds to a 7th or 8th gen Intel or a Zen1 CPU (or Celeron/Athlon equivalents on the low end). These numbers line up with their SFF and full fat desktop brethren, for reference.

All of these machines can come with 35W, 65W, and 95W TDP CPUs (or closest to those numbers in the case of the AMD CPUs). If you are looking at the minis, you’ll want to avoid the upper end (which are all K-series CPUs) on account of the fan needing to constantly run to cool them. Usually a T-series (or E-series for AMD) CPU will have the same power draw as a non-T CPU, but lower performance and lower peak heat production, which is actually important here because of how small these boxes are.

Depending on how old you go, the minis mostly have either an M.2 slot plus a proprietary port for SATA (2.5 inch drives only) or two M.2 slots. There is a configurable portion the back that can be anything from a VGA/D-SUB out to a Thunderbolt port or even a full dGPU (which would also use up the space for your SATA drive). If you buy off-lease hardware, it is almost always the former, but swapping these out are super simple. Just make sure the part exists for the exact model of miniPC you want - they get stupid specific on what is and isn’t compatible.

Depends on your gaming box.

If your gaming box has fewer cores (say, an older i5 or current i3 CPU), you might notice Nextcloud running. Pihole is so light I doubt you’d notice even if your gaming CPU was a potato.

If your gaming box is more than four cores, I doubt you’d ever notice.

Out of curiosity, do you have everything in /tank? As in tens of thousands of directories or files directly in the root versus a tree of directories?

Might I recommend starting without doing the router bits?

The reasoning is simple - if the rest of your homelab goes out, you just lose access to whatever you were playing with. If your homelab-router goes out, you lose Internet access.

A NAS, on the other hand, is an excellent first homelab project!

Around 90-100W typical for the part of my lab actually powered on. That is my NAS (60W typical) that has five 12/14 TB hard drives attached to a C2750 and my VM Host (35W typical, but bounces between 20W and 40W), which has a couple of SSDs attached to a R7 1700.

You don’t have to run the emulators on your NAS. In fact, you probably shouldn’t since your NAS is unlikely to be plugged in to any video output.

Pretty much anything can just point at your NAS’s shares for access to any and all emulation. Heck, I think an Amazon Fire Stick can even do it.

If your buddies want to bring over Shield Pros to play, all you should need to do is let them on to your WiFi and have read access to your roms or ISOs directory.

So… I guess I’m not quite sure where you’re going with the question?

Just keep in mind that you’re going to need to make sure your hypervisor supports BIG.little architectures if you go with option one or two. I believe the latest version of Proxmox does, but just make sure you’re on the right Linux kernel first.

1. RAID-Z2 or RAID-6 is probably more than sufficient, as that has two parity drives for a pool of drives. RAID-1 does make more sense if you are only using two drives though.
2. It can work, but generally USB enclosures aren’t the greatest approach for what you’re trying to do. Do you have space for your two internal drives instead?
3. I mean, it is exactly that - a filesystem. It is a rather advanced one, and it does have some features that would be useful for you, like snapshots so you can go back after messing up a file. It also tends to run fast at the expense of it being a bit hard to expand and eating more RAM than you’d expect.
4. Generally, anything but an SMR drive.
5. I’m not quite sure what you mean?
6. PCPartPicker, sort by price-per-TB?
7. There are only a limited number of RAID configurations, if that’s what you mean?
8. It depends; are you disciplined enough to actually run backups, or are you a normal person that needs automatic cloud backups? :P But seriously, do you think you’ll run manual backups often enough?
9. ZFS and btrfs both do a decent job at handling such things.

I mean, a NAS is literally Network Attached Storage. Your old laptop has storage and, presumably, is on the network; that’s a NAS.

The reason why people have standalone NAS boxes is because a laptop usually can’t hold all that much in the way of storage. My NAS has 42 TB of addressable storage; that’s not really viable on a laptop. Add in any form of redundancy (my 42 TB of storage comes from five hard drives), caching (32 GB of RAM helping with a read cache), or other services and people quickly outgrow a laptop or even a miniPC.

I’m generally of the camp that only have storage and storage-based services on my NAS, so the CPU of my NAS is super weak compared to my actual home server. There is a good chance the CPU in your laptop might be stronger than my NAS’s CPU even. Other people combine their NAS with their home server, needing a stronger CPU as a result.

As for why a prebuilt? Some people don’t want to delve into that and just want Storage That Works ™. I don’t dive into networking content all that much, hence a prebuilt router instead of something using opnSense or something. I’m happy playing around in the guts of a storage box (it really isn’t all that complicated), so I roll my own.

Are you actually in PCIe lane contention?

You have a dGPU using an x16 slot, an HBA using an x8 slot, and a SAS expander using an… x4 slot, I think? That last one I’m not sure about, please correct me if/when I’m wrong. While yes, that adds up to needing 28 lanes of PCIe on paper… most dGPUs don’t actually need an x16 slot. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me if you could get away with an x4 slot - meaning you really just need an x8, x4, and x4 - which adds up to sixteen lanes.

Now, I don’t know what you’re using that dGPU for, it is entirely possible you have some type of need for that many lanes… but you might be able to just shuffle them around and make things work better than they are now.

Far be it for me to stop a homelabber from throwing more money at the hobby of course, but maybe you don’t have to?

How much storage are you looking at?

I’ve been trying to recommend Z1 for up to four drive arrays and Z2 for five to eight.

And no need to mirror your boot drive.

I mean, a 10th gen i3 sounds great for a NAS to me, and last I knew TrueNAS doesn’t support BIG.little architectures like many 12th and all 13th gen Intel CPUs anyway if you do go down that road. So I’d probably do the former unless if you can sell that box for enough to match the price difference

What are you using the GPU for?

If you really want a prevuilt solution, Asustor has two.