Synth noodling conceptual artist

  • 13 Posts
  • 581 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 27th, 2023

help-circle



  • Controversial opinion… Not all horror has to be event horror and that a lot of what we are perceiving as Indie Horror success right now is actually just a form of mainstream-like hype.

    Take Longlegs… The trailers, the casting of Cage… These are classic mainstream cinema tactics.

    Novelty is fine, but doesn’t that ho back to the times of free vomit bags and life insurance policies?

    Maybe grabbing attention should be from well crafted films telling great narratives that resonate with audiences, and if you have to think “outside of the box” then your box isn’t big enough in the first place.







  • There’s an interesting thing there about the legitimacy of the artist.

    Most artists and creative I know are rather comfortable with people disagreeing with them and the value of what they make because they understand the value of it to themselves.

    I’m an artist and that happens because I make art, not because someone bestows the title on me.

    I think the AI crowd is touchy because they dont get that. What joy is there when it is made for you? A prompt is not craft.

    I think the main condition here is that he wants to be seen as a writer when he doesn’t write. He could legitimately call himself a storyteller, or someone who crafts narratives, but that isn’t legitimate for him. Instead he needs the validation of a title he doesn’t deserve.

    I also wonder how he deals with criticism of the product. If someone reviewing his books calls the language clumsy, does he see that as his failure as a writer or the failure of the AI. The fact he will have to confront that is fascinating.

    It isn’t my painting that sucks, it is the image I copied it from.


  • The devil is in the details. Different contracts state different usages.

    Often, I’m hired to make things for folk, and they own it entirely. I see these things out in the world, I sometimes see other artists hired to butcher it to fit a new purpose. But that’s OK, I account for that, and often I hand over the source files from the things I make… Layered documents etc.

    However, there’s a really disturbing trend of large companies appropriating fan art and claiming that because they own the IP any derivatives belong to them too. This is far ickier.

    The main thing though is credit. You’d think that giving a nod to the original artist would be nice. It costs nothing and can have a massive impact on their business.



  • adam_y@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlWords
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    Not viruses as such, at least according to the inventor of the term, rather they are already part of our inheritable structure, our DNA (so to speak) seeking new ways to be inherited.

    We are our memes.








  • I’m telling you this as someone that works in the arts, that’s just not true.

    You can pirate digital material and repackage it. I see illustrators getting their designs ripped off by large scale clothing manufacturers all the time.

    Similarly, I know some acts that have heard their music on adverts and films and haven’t been paid. It seems like it is being stolen if you ask me.

    There needs to be protection or the creation of art becomes a luxury for those that can afford to not make money from it.