Dang, I only got like 6 or 7 of these, even though I know all the bands.

Was thinking that they could have easily done counting crows too

So if new games start using ai, which is generated from pirating content, it is ethical to pirate those games

That’s what happens when you give the richest people tax breaks and subsidise all your rich buddies endevours without uplifting the lowest socio-economic portions if society.

The best way to fix the economy is always to give the poorest more money (or less financial burden) because they spend a much higher percentage (usually all) of their excess income to keep afloat or improve their way of life.

The worst way is to give rich people more money. Because they horde it, gamble on non tangible goods (stocks, crypto, “ai” etc), send it off shore, keep it in the family and share it with other rich people etc.

It’s ironic that the party that always does the worse thing for the economy and demonises doing the best is seen by the masses as the “good for the economy” party.

I mean, not a single other current movie/show on their front page has 99% audience score.

Even if Melanoma was secretly good and “the critics were trying to bury it” they would be suspicious.

It’ll be a shit load of bots, and then the same reactionary people that make everything politically partisan and mass review bomb anything “woke”

People that didn’t see it and don’t care about “how well it does” won’t review it at all, so there’s no counter votes because… Literally no one seeing it.

Damn, those people under the boat must have had mad lungs

I’m shocked how far I had to scroll to find Wayne’s world…and having an existential crisis at his quickly time moves 😅

It blows my mind that you can just stumble across that stuff on a popular public forum

This also explains why any “woke” movie or TV series gets immediately review bombed

Yeah exactly. Ultimately they became money machines, and they only exist to make more money now… Some will have willfully amoral motivations (Cambridge analytica, palantir) and others will just persue more money, regardless of the outcome of his they do it, I.E implicily amoral.

I don’t think the websites all started thinking “I’ll harvest data for the inevitable surveillance state”

Google actually started with great intentions and hoped to translate the data into revenue via “normal” ads

But… Dogy ass holes paid better than ads, and, like most companies, whenever they get successful/big enough, everything goes out the window in favour of profits

Good while post reeks of alt right incel bullshit. Basically celebrating trad wives/family and getting rid of “bad” races.

This is one of the best YouTube essays there are imo.

Hbommerguy is the goat

Someone should show him the video of Trump and guiliani in drag.

Yeah, I came to the same understanding when I used to counter conspiracy nuts denying climate change and evolution etc.

You’ll never convince them they’re wrong or hypocrites… But people who stumble upon the thread that are not super critical thinkers will see the discussion and you can help them realise the person is actually full of shit.

Sometimes they can lie believably enough that people fall for it, and some of those people will snap out of it when they see the contradiction and logical fallacies.

Be the change you want to see

The nra, constantly talking about the need for everyone to have guns to prevent tyranny.

Now government agents are doing illegal shit (kidnapping, assaulting, deporting legals, and outright murder) and all the of a sudden “citizens need to stop antagonising” is their reply? Because it’s their thugs.

The bright side of all this horrific bullshit is that, assuming it’s even possible to have fair elections in the future, you can immediately dismiss anyone on the right when they try to play the “moral superior” card as a justification for their bullshit

“but freedom of speech”, “2nd amendment”, “protect kids from pedofiles”. Nah fuck of mate. You completely disregarded all of that when it was “once of you”. You don’t get to play that card anymore.

Being epsteins best friend, saying how much they have in common because “he likes them young like me”, being the president that promised to release the files, now having that power to do that and refusing to do so…

The same people that wanted to shoot up a pizza place and kids reading sessions in public libraries because of completely. imaginary links to pedophilia are totally fine with trump though.

Imagine being shy and 6’7 😅

He’s an extremely out of shape demented pedofile attempting to look human

I’m not saying they’re correct in not calling it that, or that the system necessarily works that way, but they’ll have lawyers to look over everything in these sorts of scenarios and they’ll, usually, ask to play it safe.

Also, re point 2, it’s different to say “autopsy says it’s homicide” vs the paper/journalist saying that they were murdered. Unless it’s legally ruled as such (judge/court case), the news agency could be liable if they said it themselves. The headline is essentially just quoting someone else.