Comparatively speaking, yes. You won’t see sense because you have you head up his arse, but then again you are probably some loser who thinks you’ll “make it” by kicking a ball around. Grow up.

Ronaldo came from humble beginnings and appears to be modest at least. Messi was given all the opportunities and was at an advantage over Ronaldo, basically Ronaldo worked for his success and earnt it, Messi was silver spoon fed.

Depends on the nature of the ban/relegation. If it’s points then they leave because it would be difficult to earn 1150 points in a set number of years of a contract, that’s almost definitely a guaranteed relegation to the national League at best. Many would leave even if it’s only to say, league one.

Hear me out, each transfer window there is a 70m limit for spending, however it can roll on to 3 windows in advance. This means that united/city/Newcastle/arsenal types cannot make a 100m signing every window, and it would force either saving or smart spending.

Wolves fan, obviously biased but I can see why the ref blew up initially but VAR should have the power to look and immediately say no ref, play on. I watch and play rugby and the TMO has a delayed feed aswell as a live one, they can refer a ref back or correct any decisions quite sharpish and if VAR had that then this would have been resolved before. It is clear and obvious when reviewed, the change I would make is “clear and obvious” shouldn’t apply to penalties or foul decisions and it should be “has there been foul play” for this situation. Therefore the ref has to look and it’s not up to the VAR official. Here’s a simple format for decisions:

Offside=has there been a clear and obvious mistake?

Handballs=is there a clear and obvious handball contact?

Fouls=has there been foul play, ref reviews in person

Penalties=has there been foul play, ref reviews in person