Comparisons aren’t exact matches but the relationship still stands. Individuals are tied to both, ideology they both share exists.
You’re trying to paint them as two totally different things and they’re not. You’re comparing apples and pears
I’d still say it’s related
The sons of liberty didn’t set up America but they certainly played a huge role.
And likely some people were involved with both.
It’s like you’ve never used the Internet before.
Except in your analogy there are no women or children or noncombatants. So you think it makes sense. But it’s more like if you had an army of knights vs an army of peasants but both armies had babies tied to them and your goal is to stop the baby killing.
Removing armor does nothing.
The casualty ratio is because it’s specifically not a war. Israel claiming it is a war is part of their push. I know you know that though.
So why didn’t MTG try to pass legislation to remove that fleet? Because that wasn’t her goal. Instead she managed to sow more division and get nothing done while stroking you all and making you feel justified and giving you a place to put your anger.
Jesus eye roll x100000
Bailing out the banks to avoid a financial collapse is the correct solution. It wasn’t Obama who allowed banks to become this careless with their money.
This drone bombing argument is a red flag you’re clueless about the entire presidency. Bush was getting soldiers killed, drone tech evolved. Why wouldn’t you use drones to reduce soldier’s casualties? 150,000 soldiers at the start of his presidency dropped to 20,000. Anyone who thinks Obama is a warmonger genuinely doesn’t remember Russia/Georgia and has no idea what they are talking about. At all.
His entire presidency was bogged down by Republican bullshit. Obamacare being the prime victim. This is not the Obamacare he wanted.
You’re literally parroting Republican talking points and you’re obscenely incorrect about them.
Okay.
How does that lead to a solution? How does that not lead to more fighting and death?
Source? I’d love to see
No that’s usually because he’s like involved with shit people somehow
I’m saying that’s not the path to a solution.
On one hand that just galvanized more aggression and people wanna act like there is no more aggression that can be had, there is.
I also think much like the country I live in, most of us don’t like our government and I think poor people are always the weapon. Israeli kids are now getting killed too, their government isn’t going to change its tone over that.
And on top of it all, look at these comments. None of these people understand what is being voted for, all they see is the headline. This entire thread is full of people who pride themselves on knowing, being smart, being confident in their opinion. Yet none of them thought to consider MTG is what she always is, a baboon banging the drum for attention while getting nothing done.
This bill was never going to be stopped, that’s the truth. The US will never not supply Israel. What is the REAL solution to that honestly? I think that’s what people are trying to figure out. Governments make money conducting genocides and building weapons to justify more genocides. What are we gonna do about that?
Well I dunno but it certainly isn’t drowning ever progressive when they misstep or you disagree with them.
Lol what? Whatever you fantasize about kid
In your opinion.
Half you bozos here believe Russia was forced to invade another country.
Ahh now that it fits the division you seek you’re all about human rights lawyers but once they talk about subjects hexbear doesn’t like it’s all color revolution and slander?
I disagree but again that’s politics. I think it’s easy to throw shit from the audience but when it comes to navigating these things it’s far more than just ideals and instead of progress we drag any sense of it through the mud because it’s imperfect.
Y’all had a different tune to play when Ukraine was unfolding
Politicians actions aren’t.
Idealist. Everything is black and white, is or is not.
You’ve spoken to every single one of them?
Because that’s not true I literally know them
I’m just saying this whole argument of progressives and Dems and RINOs and stupid shit is part of why there is no actual progress.
A) their job is to represent their voters. Not enforce their own opinions
B) progressives consume each other like crabs in a bucket while terrible politicians don’t care and move ahead
You’re like really mad about this while being completely obtuse. Relax.
The Mujahedeen weren’t as organized or as unionized, they were scrambled together to fight the Russians. When that was over another imperial force was pushing onto them, now organized they sort of merged with radicalized groups to form what is the Taliban. I had to Google his name but Jalauddin Haqqani is an exact example of what I mean, cut his teeth fighting Russians and moved to fighting US/NATO.
The ideology they share is main entire reason they were fighting in the first place that you’re completely overlooking. The entire reason any of this happened. To fight imperial powers, to remove them from their country. Which is the same thing the sons of liberty wanted hence the comparison.
They’re not vaguely nonsecular afghan paramilitaries. They’re people motivated to fight western influence and were lining up under dozens of labels to do so.
How is this hard to understand?