Come on, I’m sure you learned something during your unloved childhood.

Your only passion in life is to now vaguely troll people who disagree with genocide?

How dare anyone worry about a well oiled orphan crushing machine when we should all join hands and worry about one single orphan instead!

It’s very obvious that you have no actual LGBTQT friends or you wouldn’t use them for political capital fear mongering a “potential trans genocide” while already trans Americans have being killed at extreme rates in Biden-Harris’s America.

As someone who endorses genocide, trans people should look to Harris for salvation from danger! Remember to never question the sadistic people who create trolley problems!

I can’t improve anyone’s reading comprehension from where I stand.

Who said it was my responsibility to offer a simplistic solution to an undefined problem?

#translives matter! Except trans Gazans!

Is “dip shit” what your bullies called you as a child?

Do you think you are bullying any progressives with your long-winded hateful rants?

You have the geopolitical awareness level of a goldfish, it’s impressive.

The lives of immigrants and trans people will be objectively worse under Trump than Harris.

The same Harris who promised to fund Trump’s border wall with hundreds of millions of dollars??

Kamala Harris pledges to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the wall along the southern border — a project she once opposed and called “un-American” during the Trump administration.

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/27/kamala-harris-flip-flops-border-wall

How incredibly privileged and ignorant must one be to believe their lives are being kept from “from getting worse” under Harris?

Your claim implying “issues only exist or worsen under Trump” is as bizarre as it is unsubstantiated.

Thanks to Harris, abortion rights have been preserved in America? There was no meaningful* change under her administration?

Why are you desperate to make this personal and attack me rather than stay on topic?

Why are you desperate to discuss Trump instead of Harris?

You quoted yourself, then attacked the strawman with all you had.

You then expect me to defend your made up straw argument, failed.

Since you seem to need it, I’ve explained it to you like a 5 year old.

I mean you said those words, no need to beat yourself up cause you have a little straw on your face.

The grammar nazi in you won’t allow answering imperfectly formed questions huh.

You believe Harris has somehow preserved abortion rights and that others are delusional?

Even if Harris doesn’t “fix” those issues, preventing them from getting worse is better than allowing them to get worse. No improvement on abortion access is objectively better

A person who made their career out of imprisoning mostly black and brown men should be somehow seen as strongly against “black people dying more at the hands of police”?

You can still attempt an answer, I’m not trying to discourage you.

If democrats as a group broadly endorse the genocide of Palestinians, how can they still be taken seriously regarding issues like abortion (rights ended during Dem presidency) and BLM?

Is there a reason you refuse to make your question more clear?

I want to understand your question. Do you believe 50% is the only key threshold where support for genocide becomes problematic?

If less than most Democrats support genocide, then there is no cause for concern?

Sorry to hear you’re comfortable with more Palestinians being murdered

Psychological projection

is a defence mechanism of alterity concerning “inside” content mistaken to be coming from the “outside” Other. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

How was her position unclear?

Google:

August 7, 2024 (Harris was certified by the Democratic National Committee)

A previous report from August 15, 2024, stated that the death toll in Gaza had reached over 40,000.

I have nothing in common who sees these innocent people dead as a sign Harris somehow shares a value of “pro-Palestinians not being murdered”.

Not everyone has the capacity to engage with hard questions.

Not that you tried anyway.

The heart of your logic enables true evil.

Do you think a person should excuse their partner’s abuse, because a previous partner was more abusive?

Why do you imply more importance for the recognition of “improvement” than a recognition and rejection of abuse in general?