• 3 Posts
  • 284 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 19th, 2024

help-circle


  • This is a known issue that the dev is working on. I think the current workaround is to change the app theme from “iOS” to “Android” (unsure about other theme options).

    On Android it’s called Device Mode in the System section of Settings > Appearance > Themes.

    Edit: I made this setting change earlier and the above was my first chance to test it. Can confirm: changing the theme to “Android” works on my Samsung phone.











  • I never pre-order nor pay for early access. Examples are plenty, but a couple that spring to mind are New World and Ashes of Creation. (Even excluding the infinite early access of PUBG, and whatever the hell Star Citizen is).

    For the former, their “beta test” was “yeah, it runs: ship it” and ZERO feedback was noted or actioned. The release day was The Single Worst game release I’ve ever seen, and 4 years later when Amazon decided to kill it, ALL of the beta bugs were still there. To be fair, it was a “pay once” game. With MTX, of course.

    For the latter, people started by paying $300+ for “alpha access” and more recently $100 for the same thing. And it’s clearly 2-4 years away from being remotely ready for release. Those people are paying to do QA. And it will be pay-per-month on release, as if it was 2010.

    If your FOMO overrides your other faculties, and you’re willing to put up with all of that, then fine. You do you. 👍🏻

    Every pre-order bonus I’ve seen is a skin, title or other tat that doesn’t have any value beyond signalling that you pre-ordered the game.

    Me? I’m done playing these financial games with video games. Until a game is released/GA, it’s vapourware and non-existent. But again: you do you.


  • It’s true that people on the internet can be dicks. Even more so technical people (and that’s not limited to online: those online dicks are usually IRL dicks when taking technical stuff). But that’s a hurdle, not a barrier.

    There’s little anyone here can do to help OP, as they (if I understand it correctly) have already irreparably nuked their hardware. The current problem is significantly different and harder than the original problem. Asking randos on this community is unlikely to yield results. Hence the focus on variations of “Now… what did we learn? 🤨”

    I’m not trying to help, as I’m not familiar enough with SAS nor the current problem. The same is likely true of others here.


  • Brewchin@lemmy.worldtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldChatGPT fried my drive!? [Solved]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    Can you really blame anyone who turns to AI, because that garbage at least sounds like it tries to help you?

    A comfortable lie is still a lie. Everything that comes out of an LLM is a lie until proven otherwise. (“Lie” is a bit misleading, though, as they don’t have agency or intent: they’re a variation of your phone keyboard’s next-word text prediction algorithm. With added flattery and confidence.)

    There’s a reason experienced people stress hard to others about not using them as shortcuts to your own knowledge. This is the outcome.

    Another way to look at it is “trust, but verify”. If you’re intent on relying on probabilistic text as an answer, instead of bothering to learn, then take what it’s given you and verify what that does before doing it. You could learn to be an effective sloperator with just that common sense.

    But if you’re going to give an LLM root/admin access to a production environment, then expect to be laughed at, because you had plenty of opportunities to not destroy something and actively chose not to use them.