I can’t say for sure, I only shoot skeet and wood targets on dirt/ground-backed hills.

But https://www.atomicdefense.com/blogs/news/can-bullets-go-through-brick seems to say: “Heavier rounds such as a 7.62x39mm or .308 rifle may penetrate the walls of a brick-veneered house, but it is not likely”

I could imagine a higher caliber hunting round going through a brick wall when pointed at it, but it should be rare to have a high caliber rifle loaded with high caliber rounds off-safety and able to be misfired by a child/dog/freak accident.

And in the UK, that’s just pretty much too impossibly rare to be occurring. The likelihood is higher here, but god I wish it wasn’t

Have you ever shot at brick or stone? Yeah, the right caliber will go right through, but it’s not flying through with near the same velocity as through drywall, paint, and dreams , the stuff my walls are made of right now.

Surely there were better semi-action RPGs…but the vibes and the depth of some systems on those games were great

deleted by creator

I think it’s more like our bodies are blank canvases. They need some color and embellishing to really accent what’s already there

Why do you say that? I had this exact conversation today at work

I just went digging to find quotes from that episode for my husband. Thank you for this lol

Live in the north where southerners flee to for jobs (still a shitty Red state) and the range is a regular for gun people. When I had friends that shoot, it was an every or every other weekend thing for the cheap shit, once month take out something nice to shoot that costs a little.

And some steel workers wild tanks, some auto workers are contracted for government vehicles, email providers facilitate global pedophile rings.

It’s weird to make the claim in general because… yeah, every job might have people doing evil things in some section of the industry. Tearing down unions only supports the rich and the evil

I remember being in college when a lady brought this up. Talked about Black Walstreet and the class’ vibes were really “no they didn’t and please stop talking” but the professor agreed with her, and I looked it up later abd was shocked to find yet another atrocity completely omitted from my k-12 education.

I think you may be taking the criticism at your religion and not the people.

Judaism is in a fun boat where it’s ethnicity and culture, so I say this next statement while knowing the above l:

People don’t dislike the Jewish faith for circumcision. They dislike Jewish people who adhere to nonsensical and harmful traditions. Someone’s religion holds no bearing to me as far as the denomination itself, it’s what they choose to carry forward. I had Muslim friends in college who I’d get into disagreements with, because some of them genuinely believed some backwards shit about women. Some didn’t, and I was closer with those that didn’t. I don’t dislike those people who thought differently than me, but I did like them less, if only because they were letting their culture/tradition get in the way of facts and modern sensibilities.

You can continue to practice whatever fundamentalist beliefs you choose, know that people are often judging the act and not the religion as a whole, at least, that’s been the case when I’ve dived deeper with people who express it.

Genital mutilation is genital mutilation. You can say you do it for cultural reasons, but the response from those that disagree with it’s existence have nothing to do with your culture and everything to do with the barbarity of the medically unnecessary cosmetic genital surgery.

After reading through a lot of the comments:

Because he’s coming off oh so very condescending and espousing the SAME ‘level’ of opinion as everyone else but getting combative/rude sith his responses being called out for having the same objective merit.

You can have an opinion. BUT:

“Why don’t you like this?” “Because it’s a controller, duh” “But things can have extra little things in them” “It’s useless, it’s a controller. Lame of you to like it”

People here in Lemmy often seem to have this problem where they communicate EXACTLY over text how they might in real life, but not realize that 0% of their non-verbals are coming through and so if they don’t change the writing style it just comes off prick-ish and argumentative

I don’t know, i’ve NEVER seen a believable performance from Dwayne Johnson. But John Cena and Bautista have both really dug down and widened their range. The rock does the same movie, same shirt, same stupid Kevin Hart addition, constantly. The guy from The Run Down is the same as the guy from fast and furious is the same from gridiron gang.

From the comforts of my bed chambers, a reflecting mirror shows me my favorite performances on demand, and when I tire of them I may seek almost the entirety of mankind’s knowledge via my personal looking glass and converse with other like-minded sorcerers across the world on any such matter we choose.

Truly, no king has lived so well

Okay, but no joke, if removing a crucifix suddenly allowed me to turn a previously indestructible baby into red mist, I think there might be a god and he might have had a plan or foresight into this whole boondoggle

Great Pass! Great Pass!

Are you saying that me remarking the lack of verifiable sources is in somehow a logical fallacy?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

Read again, in case you needed the refresher

None corroborated in any meaningful way that I was able to find

Same, just got to the final season of SG1, and was worried how everyone’s careers are going to progress before we swap to sg Atlantis

PLEASE DON’T WATCH WATERSH8P DOWN 1972 AS SUNDAY MORNING CARTOONS

That is to say, don’t do it if you don’t have adult kids and aren’t particularly keen on some well-animated animal violence.

Crazy how different those two products are