kindaforgotit@alien.topB to The Arsenal@soccer.forumEnglish · 1 year agoPlayers Clubs May Lose For AFCON @BBCSportalien.topimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imagePlayers Clubs May Lose For AFCON @BBCSportalien.topkindaforgotit@alien.topB to The Arsenal@soccer.forumEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-squareUgoboy23@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIf a player is good enough then AFCON is negligible to clubs. See Osimhen’s current situation. Also don’t act like Mahrez wasn’t just at City for 5 years.
minus-squareUgoboy23@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou’re honestly going to say Mahrez at City was 3rd string for 5 years?…. Don’t gotta lie to make a point.
minus-squareExtra-Firefighter835@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo he absolute was not
minus-squareChi-Town_Gunner@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSaying they’ve had 1 relevant African player in the last 5 years really doesn’t support argument
minus-squareUgoboy23@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoPoint was Mahrez was a player that was good enough so City didn’t care that he was off to AFCON. City not having more African players probably had to do with the lack of truly world class options rather than Pep not buying because of AFCON.
If a player is good enough then AFCON is negligible to clubs. See Osimhen’s current situation. Also don’t act like Mahrez wasn’t just at City for 5 years.
Was 3rd string
You’re honestly going to say Mahrez at City was 3rd string for 5 years?….
Don’t gotta lie to make a point.
No he absolute was not
Saying they’ve had 1 relevant African player in the last 5 years really doesn’t support argument
Point was Mahrez was a player that was good enough so City didn’t care that he was off to AFCON.
City not having more African players probably had to do with the lack of truly world class options rather than Pep not buying because of AFCON.