Greetings y’all. I’ve been using ways to circumvent YouTube ads for years now. I’d much rather donate to creators directly instead of using Google as a middle man, needing YouTube Premium. If even pay for premium for just a add free version, if the price wouldn’t be so outrageous. I’ve So far used adblockers, Vanced and then Revanced.

Since the recent developments in this matter, I’ve setup Tubearchivist, a self hosted solution to download YouTube videos for later consumption. It mostly works great, with a few minor things that bother me but I highly recommend it. ReVanced also still works, but nobody knows for how long.

The question now is, if I should use a VPN to obscure my identity to Google. I don’t know if I’m being paranoid here but I wouldn’t put it past Google to block my account, if they see YouTube traffic for my IP address and no served ads. Revanced even uses my main Google account, so not that far fetched.

So far, or at least to my knowledge, Google has never done this but I think they just might in the future. So I’m planning on putting tubearchivist behind a VPN via gluetun.

What do you think? I’m eager to hear your opinions on this.

I can also add my docker compose, if there’s interest and when I’m back on my PC.

  • java@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t see them blocking accounts. What would it achieve? Their goal is to monetize you. By taking you out of the equation, they can’t monetize you anymore. You’ll probably keep doing what you were doing anonymously or with a new account, so blocking you won’t reduce costs either.

    On the other hand, Google is collecting a lot of data. Maybe now they aren’t using it very effectively, but sooner or later they might find a key to make YouTube Premium a viable option even for someone like you. By using YouTube and other Google services, you are providing key fragments.

    • Pete90@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re probably correct on your assumption that Google also will lose something if they start banning accounts without warning.

      You can also be certain that I, as well as other technically inclined persons, will try and get what they want through other means. A valid point.

      Considering this, the only strategy I can see them using is some scare tactics. You will lose your Google account if you keep doing what you do, so give us money! This, however, will only work if they give people warnings, which they haven’t don’t yet.

      Thank you for your input, much appreciated! I’ll stick to a VPN for now, as it doesn’t cost me anything. I’m just a cautious person.

  • mholiv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would say air on the side of caution. I don’t use any google services outside of YouTube so me getting my account banned would cost me nothing. I personally wouldn’t be hurt at all if my account was banned.

    If you live in google world and suddenly and irrevocably losing all your google accounts/access/data would be painful you should go with a VPN. Google is a private company where you have no rights to appeal.

    Lastly if you do live in google world you should consider getting out. Don’t let mega companies run your life by fear nor allure.

    Edit: Don’t use free VPNs. If you are not paying you are the product.

    • Pete90@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m in the process of degoogeling my live. I’ve never used it much, but my phone and the apps that I’ve bought over the years are tied to my account. I still use the calendar and have been to lazy to switch. Google maps too is a big plus. I’ve already gotten rid of cloud storage, as I selfhost nextcloud.

      I use airvpn, which is recommended now as mullvad got rid of port forwarding.

      • mholiv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s rough in some spots but doable. If you are looking for search replacement I found that paying for Kagi was the only way to go. Unlike DuckDuckGo and Bing it does not suck. I’m convinced the reason is because they don’t try to sell you ads.

        • Pete90@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Kagi was somewhat expensive, if I recall. 10 bucks for unlimited searches put me off, as I don’t have a lot of money right now…

    • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t actually get banned, they just don’t let you watch youtube videos until you turn off your adblocker. You can even sign out and never see the ad block blocks because its tied to your account only.

      • mholiv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        True but we don’t know what google does to accounts that are bulk download videos from their platform for offline viewing. It’s definitely against the terms of service.

        • Pete90@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jup, that is precisely what I meant and why I advocate for people to be cautious, if they use their Google account for more things than just YouTube.

  • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    WDYM “block your account” exactly?

    You’re being paranoid. Google isn’t going to dick around blocking individuals.

  • Destragras@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure how using a VPN would help in this situation if you are concerned about having your YouTube account banned? Would you being using that VPN while signed out and with cookies/site data cleared?

    • Pete90@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That would be the case, since tubearchivist requires no account and runs on my server, so no cookies as well.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They might do it, but there could also be a cost to Google if they started banning people’s accounts based on uncertain behavioural metrics. I expect it would at least be a while before they’d go that far. But a VPN can’t hurt.

  • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think they would block your account, I think they would just block all youtube downloading methods at some point. I use mpv with yt-dlp to watch youtube and it sometimes breaks. I don’t think a vpn would help in any way.

  • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t read your whole post… But have you tried tubesync? It’s similar to tubearchvist if I recall.

    • Pete90@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the other way round. I do pay for a VPN anyway and I donate via patron to support creators. A dollar here, a dollar there. It’s still cheaper than a subscription here in Germany and my favorite creators get a bigger payout. I’d be happy to pay for premium if it was something like 5 euros, but 12 a month.

        • Pete90@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is the bullshit. I take 5 bucks every month and use those for patreon. I cycle through the channels so everybody gets a bit. I only pay the lowest tier for one month, then cancel again. Next month, a few different creators…

          One view with ads is worth in the area of a cent, most likely less. Most channels upload once or twice a months. If the lowest paying tier is a dollar, they just made 50 times what they would get for ad revenue.

            • Pete90@feddit.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not paying everyone. Pretty much impossible. Here is my logic for what I’m doing on detail.

              Netflix is 8 Euro a month here in Germany as a basic plan. I can share that with my girlfriend. They produce movies and then stream those to me. I use it quite often. I’m totally okay with what I’m getting for my money and pay happily.

              Youtube is 12 Euro per month. I can’t share that plan with my girlfriend, as it would fuck up the algorithm. Youtube hosts videos but doesn’t produce content. I’m not happy with the value in getting.

              Now I try to pay creators directly. Can I pay all of them? No. Can I be just? No. Is youtube just? Also no. Small creators get nothing. So I take my 5 euros and divide among creators. Next month a few others and so on. I can choose which ones, depending on how I feel about their content. I find a brilliant channel who helped me out with a project and who’s got patreon? Sure, why not? Last one here was DbTech, which I’m not subscribed to.

              So the difference between income for content creators is Youtube Premium: 55 percent of 12 euros is 5,4 euros, My system: about 5 euros. The only difference being how the money is divided. I try to favor smaller channels.

              In the end, I believe my system is superior, as gives me more control on where I spend my money. I only try to screw over Google, because they are greedy as fuck!