• Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is just as irrational for me to make the claim I made as you to make yours without evidence. Fortunately the arguments against car-dependent infrastructure planning go far beyond “we don’t like 'em”. The human and environmental benefits of walkable cities with robust public transit and the unsustainability of car-dependency speak for themselves. What other issue of political advocacy would “some people disagree” fly as a reasonable argument? The whole point of advocacy is to shift the tide of popular opinion enough to make material change

        • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not “some” people though is it?

          ??? It is indeed “some” people lmao. Not all people, not no people, some people.

          What I’m against is people taking it too far to the extreme and punishing car owners like the little eco fascists they are.

          Ah I see, so you’re against an imaginary straw man! Glad we got that sorted out.

          You are a completely unserious contrarian and there is no point in talking to you.