Utah sues TikTok, alleging it lures children into addictive and destructive social media habits::Utah has become the latest state to sue TikTok, alleging the social media company is “baiting” children into addictive and unhealthy habits.

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s possible for more than one thing to be bad, we don’t have to pick just one of the two.

        This is what they said; they implied the root comment was saying that two things couldn’t be bad or only one could be solved. But it didn’t. He said, paraphrasing, “there are two issues and I find this one to be far worse”.

        Ranking issues in terms of how bad they are seems a fairly normal thing to do. It also implies that there is more than one.

        • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          they implied the root comment was saying that two things couldn’t be bad or only one could be solved.

          I don’t agree with that interpretation.

          They simply stated that ranking things by “badness” also implies a ranking in terms of which one of those bad things is more urgent and should be addressed first - not that one thing was bad and that the other wasn’t, or that only one thing could be addressed.

            • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m merely reiterating the position of the poster you replied to.

              You can disagree with that position, but you seemed to be replying to a position that nobody was even taking.

                • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You were clearly arguing against a position that nobody here took.

                  That means you either lack the reading comprehension to understand what was stated, or you’re purposefully creating a strawman to argue against.

                  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’ve explained in detail, you’ve not understood the explanation and taken an illogical stance.

                    I can’t help you out of a hole you’ve put yourself in. It’s okay to disagree though, you don’t have to lower yourself to ad hominems.