• UnshavedYak@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. Moreover, i want clients and implementations that help summarize and reduce doomscroll behavior. Social networks have value (imo), but they also have a cost and i’m tired of paying that. Reddit built a habit in so many of us to go back to it during any downtime, doomscroll more time than we wanted or expected, become overly invested in karma, arguments, etc. Reddit also has zero incentive to fix any of this, as it was perfect for engagement. Reddit is Facebook is Twitter, and i’m tired of those applications drugging my brain.

      I definitely do not want Reddit. I want the value we got from Reddit, without the cost.

      • oxjox@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Buddy, doomscrolling is your own issue. Are you old enough to remember “doomscrolling” cable television for hours at night? We’re all choosing to distract ourselves from something else or we’re just bored. It’s nothing new.

        I mean, if you’re having trouble stepping away from something, it almost sounds like you’re describing an addiction problem. Everyone should make it a practice to step outside themselves for a moment and assess all their habits.

        You’re not seriously suggesting that a platform prevent its users from using it, are you? LOL where have I seen that in the news this week?

        • UnshavedYak@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re not seriously suggesting that a platform prevent its users from using it, are you? LOL where have I seen that in the news this week?

          Jeez, this feels quite hostile.

          I’m a developer. I’m working on this problem myself. You can craft features which promote a behavior or inhibit it. For example focusing only on live oriented features, making sure that posts show up constantly and with little ability to see what previous came, i would argue, focuses behavior on addictive FOMO. Features that help summarize historical posts to leave you with less of a feeling of FOMO does the opposite. Quite difficult to get FOMO if the summary of posts only changes once every 5 hours, right? You should see the ideas here. All of which i want to explore.

          Features promote behavior. Some drive engagement, some reduce engagement. I seek features which reduce engagement by way of inhibiting FOMO and promoting the feeling of being informed on what it is you were seeking.

          I’m suggesting a platform which focuses on features that help users avoid what i feel are negative outcomes. Which is wholly different than saying that all platforms need to do this. Why is this controversial to you? Should i, and users like me, not be able to use a platform which tries to eradicate (as best able) FOMO? Is FOMO other people experience somehow essential to you?

          You can have whatever platforms you like. Just because an option exists does not mean it is hostile to your preferences. To me your reply seems short sighted, entirely focused on your individual use case and ignorant of a wide array of methods people want to use to interact with these products.

          I am focused on my slice and my pie. You can have yours too, it’s okay.

          • acronymesis@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can craft features which promote a behavior or inhibit it.

            To add to your point, let’s not forget that a certain social media site used their algorithm to boost content that angers people because it also boosts engagement. It shouldn’t be controversial to want a social media that, like, doesn’t exploit negative behaviors to generate more dollars, and I think your working towards something that specifically doesn’t do that is admirable.

            This argument that a social media platform not doing evil things also exclusively means it cannot attract an audience in some other way is a false dichotomy.

          • survivorseason44@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Seconding everything here — hostile/destructive platform design is so normalized for users (of Reddit and in general) that designing services that don’t encourage doomscrolling/“anger-tainment”/FOMO/etc feels completely foreign to them, or even impossible. But it’s gotta happen, otherwise we’ll just repeat the worst parts of Reddit (and other platforms) all over again.

      • wryan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        @UnshavedYak for real. It’s so refreshing not having to see loads of wasted awards on the most facile, idiotic comments. Or the obnoxious avatars people made in place of their pfp. It seems so hyperbolic but it genuinely feels great not having to see all that anymore.

        • LostXOR@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, the lack of awards is nice. Also people seem to be much less focused on getting upvotes and more focused on actual quality content.

      • Tashlan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just to say, I 100 percent would pull RIF up in downtime but doomscrolling is not ubiquitous; I would pop into really specific communities to read about specific interests and shit that didn’t expose me to current events. I am an extremely politically plugged-in person, despite avoiding it almost entirely on reddit (unless I was in the mood), but I found shit like RIF actually allowed me to be more selective about what content I want at any given time. That kind of fine-tuned control of my information intake, of course, is completely lost on New Reddit with its barrage of random recommendations.

        • UnshavedYak@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea and i don’t mean to imply this is something everyone needs to see as a problem. Plenty of things are addictive for some and not for others. Even regardless of addiction, i just want (to explore) a set of features that is kind of anti-reddit. Explore anything that can help me feel like i didn’t miss anything, while not needing to visit more than once a day, once a week, etc. That i felt informed but that the random stuff was filtered out. etcetc

          From a developer, often these features don’t scale well either. Either complex to define (if customizable) or too costly to run, but Fediverse tweaks that a bit. We have the potential to have smaller servers with less concern for scale, etc. Fediverse has potential here, for me at least

    • wryan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s exactly what I was thinking. Even with federation off it feels like it’s already turning into a smaller version of what we had before. Not so much with post content or comments per se, but more for the already established “power users” and recreation of the exact same garbage, popular subs. I can’t believe how many people I’ve already blocked that I got sick of seeing on every single post.