• Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is not how the law works.

    Intent to destroy something expensive while not destroying anything expensive doesn’t mean you get charged for the hypothetical expenses.

    • huppakee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wrote this earlier to another reply to my comment, but i did not mean to say how a judge would rule if he did what was right; i meant to say what a judge might say in the current political climate.