• sentient_loom@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Journalism teams have been cut down below their capacity to actually do journalism. The corporate outlets just want content, so they killed journalism because clickbait is cheap.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, but I think we the public have more than a little culpability as well. The fact of the matter is that the demand for quality journalism is much lower than the damand for vapid easily consumable entertaining bullshit. It’s not just that clickbait is cheap; it’s that people want clickbait, even if they say they don’t.

      • sadreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This person gets… sure daddies are fucking us but we hardly even fighting back. Most people love the left/right circle jerk. Muhh SiDe GuD, Ur SidE BaD. I WooNz

      • sentient_loom@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those of us who actually care about having good journalism, we should subscribe to independent journalism outlets. I pay for a bunch of them, often individual journalists or small teams. They have no overhead, and they just want to pay their bills with the income from their work.

  • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate “slammed” and “blasted” and personally I only use it in a sarcastic way most of the time because of that.

    • syscollapse@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      when a headline uses those words it’s an immediate sign of buffoonery, ragebait, just dumb gossip for children. instant downvote for me wherever I see it.

    • May@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Genoxidedev1 SLAMS the use of the words ‘slammed’ and ‘blasted’ in FIERY post! Must see!”

  • Niello@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Don’t let that stop you from acknowledging the few journalists who still do real journalism though!

      • Niello@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Easy, the reporters in Ukraine. I have to dig if I want to find it but early in the war there were clips of a group of reporter risking bullets (and one actually got shot).

  • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hahaha holy fuck thats hilarious. So fucking true though. The amount of times I’ve clicked on an article that sounded interesting and then it was one paragraph and then just a bunch of tweets from randoms about it is frustrating.

    I wish we had more actual trustworthy journalism too. I have such little faith in it not being propaganda anymore. Finding out how many things I used to read that are either owned by Bezos, Murdoch, or the literal CIA (looking at you, radio free Asia, you stupid bitches you ain’t slick) has just destroyed my faith in anything I read anymore.

  • sab@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wish people would start reading actual newspapers more, rather than just clicking at whatever add-financed bullshit is trending in social media.

    Journalists are not to blame here, the problem is entirely on the side of media consumers who neither have the attention span to read quality coverage of anything nor the willingness to pay for content.

    Hopefully the fediverse will foster different dynamics in the type of news content that is shared, pushing journalism over sensationalism and confrontationalism. Not that it would solve the problem, but it would at least be a beginning.

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    What I hate is that politicians make verifiable claims constantly, yet never does a single journalist actually, you know, verify the claim.

    Every article is just: “Sen. Nimrod stated he is a huge supporter of workers rights. His opponent is claiming this is not true. ‘That’s not true.’ Said his opponent. ‘It is true.’ stated Sen. Nimrod”

    I’m often reminded of a great quote I wish more journalists followed.

    If someone says it’s raining and another person says it’s dry, it’s not your job to quote them both, your job is to look out of the fucking window and find out which is true.

  • gillrmn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Local journalists are much better in reporting today than big media. And it is actually the local news that matter much more. Mainstream media has lost its reputation by choosing which news to amplify, reporting incorrectly and not correcting properly, and overruling their journalists.

    • Classy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Local news is no better because “local news” barely exists anymore. Sure, you may see the local journos in your area talking about community interests, etc, but anything outside of that most localized of content is being controlled by large parent companies that own all of the smaller news agencies.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwA4k0E51Oo

      This is from years ago, but I can’t imagine that in the last five years this centralization has suddenly dissolved.

  • WesThisUp@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see journalism getting attacked a lot for this. I think the issue is when you put tabloid headlines/journalism in the same category as respectable journalism/news it legitimizes the tabloid and hurts respectable journalists. I would like to see a magazine or sub that tries to filter these out. It should also try to force clearly marking opinions pieces in the post or post title.