Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?

@rimu@piefed.social

What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?

Mass instance bans

Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).

Done

Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).

Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

He has abused the modlog to claim ‘harassment’, which I have never engaged in. I have not even interacted with Rimu in any way for days prior to getting kicked from the PieFed developer Matrix channels.

He has decided to mass ban 20 users because they have spoken out against his erratic and hostile behaviour as of late.

  • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auEnglish
    81·
    20 days ago

    Except she didn’t, she took the instances ideals as the reason the instance was shadowbanned as Rimu provided no actual reason.

    • null@piefed.nullspace.lolEnglish
      16·
      20 days ago

      Do you need me to quote it for you? She said she assumes the reason is that Rimu is anti-left and transphobic.

      • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auEnglish
        71·
        20 days ago

        Because you’re a lying piece of shit, I’ll quote it for you

        Apparently for ’ obvious reasons ', of which I can only assume is our left leaning anarchist/pro-trans stance

        Does that say Rimu is transphobic or that quokka.au is pro-trans? Go on tell me champ.

            • null@piefed.nullspace.lolEnglish
              16·
              20 days ago

              If someone silences you because of your pro-trans views, any reasonable person would recognize that as being “anti-pro-trans”, or more simply “anti-trans”. Another way to say that is “transphobic”.

              You disagree with that?

              • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auEnglish
                61·
                20 days ago

                I disagree with your biased interpretation.

                Rimu has not made his reasoning known, as such we can only assume it’s ideological and therefore listing the ideological stance of the instance he shadowbanned matters.

                Rimu is more than welcome to come and talk to explain why he did what he did, instead he has only tripled down on ignoring people.

                • null@piefed.nullspace.lolEnglish
                  15·
                  20 days ago

                  I disagree with your biased interpretation.

                  That’s a huuuuuge dodge.

                  Which part of my interpretation do you disagree with:

                  • If someone silences you because of your pro-trans views, any reasonable person would recognize that as being “anti-pro-trans”
                  • “anti-pro-trans” = “anti-trans”
                  • “anti-trans” = “transphobic”

                  Rimu has not made his reasoning known

                  Ehh, not super-explicitly, sure.

                  as such we can only assume it’s ideological

                  No, you choose to assume it’s ideological. But it’s telling that it’s the first thing the FAF crew always leaps to.

                  • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auEnglish
                    4·
                    20 days ago

                    Because what else would he silence an entire instance for?

                    I’m already instance banned, so it’s not like it’s for my content and everyone else isn’t as radical as me.

                    The only other reason to hide our instance must be because the way we lean in general.