Rimu published yet another hit piece against the /0 instance and this time posted it in his own instance comms as well. One of his mods jumped in, admitted they don’t know anything about anything, but nevertheless felt confident enough to state their opinion as fact and in the process insult all of us collectively, then stickied his opinion for good measure.

So I decided to reply sarcastically, at which point that mod insulted me and locked the thread, which is apparently a feature in piefed which simply hides/deletes further replies in that thread, but since it’s not a feature in lemmy, it appears to function like a shadow delete.

This is what my last reply would have been.

(Yes I’m being snarky, but that “I’m so mature” bullshit just rubs me the wrong way.)

In my opinion, using mod powers to get the last insult in, is just bastard behaviour.

  • XLE@piefed.socialEnglish
    514·
    10 days ago
    1. Does your instance ban people based on the output of chatbots?
    2. If yes to #1, do you require people who object to their bans to argue against the output of these chatbots?
    3. Were you aware that the chatbot-generated ban reason contains quotes that do not exist? And if you were, did you ever say so?
      • XLE@piefed.socialEnglish
        511·
        10 days ago

        If you don’t ban people for reasons generated by LLMs, why did you put the output of an LLM at the top of your reason for banning someone?

        This makes question 3 even more pertinent.