• daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I actually semi agree with this post.

    But parents also need to make an effort.

    I got all 3 of my nieces a tablet over the years for bdays. I set them up. Turned on parental controls before I gave it to them. It was pretty easy.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    People talking about parental controls as if that magically stops the new ways kids get bullied

  • kay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe lazy parents should stop expecting the iPad/internet to do the parenting?

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      And if they want “infrastructural help” perhaps be the change you want to see.

      I have nieces and nephews that were part of the first wave of kids growing up with internet. Had many discussions with siblings and friends about how to handle it.

      As an IT person I, of course, brought technological solutions to them, which pretty much all of them rejected.

      Turned out it was just a modification of anything else requiring adult supervision - just like cooking, mowing the lawn, or even just handling a sharp knife. They taught their kids by supervising until they were competent.

      And I was humbled.

    • 1dalm@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Clearly you’re not a parent. Which of fine, but don’t criticize.

      • one_old_coder@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I do criticize. If you can’t do your job as a parent, use condoms. Don’t fuck with society and privacy at a whole because you failed at the one and only job you had to do. Parenting.

          • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Can you describe these “crimes”? Have you considered not eroding personal privacy rights for everyone just because you don’t know how to enable parental controls?

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Parent here, its the easiest shit in the world. Takes maybe five minutes to setup parental controls on any service. Its also very easy to login to your router and block URLs. If you can’t keep up with 1 machine by just typing website into it you are part of the problem. The other part is massive corporations wanting to avoid responsibility for their products and platforms.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      That caught me off guard a bit too, but I’m glad Lemmy isn’t so much of an echo chamber that this sort of stuff doesn’t ever make it through. Nevertheless, I disagree with identity verification and any of it’s other names.

      Maybe some good conversations will come as a result.

      • 1dalm@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s a not an echo chamber entirely, if you look at my votes on the meme, it’s a fair split for something that is generally against the popular opinion (the popular opinion being “just blame the parents”).

        But the “pile on” nature of Lemmy is very real.

        • crimson_iris@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          “Boohoo, people don’t like it when I suggest curtailing everyone’s rights to privacy and anonymity to make up for my shitty parenting skills.”

      • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I will 100% blame parents who would decide to erode personal privacy rather than be bothered to talk to their children and enable parental controls.

  • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    We literally have the infrastructure to do so. Have you heard of internet filters on home routers? Parental controls? On some, it’s literally a checkbox, and is advertised on the box as an option.

    • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Eroding personal privacy to “save the kids” instead of just enabling a network filter. Better yet, we could require internet filter options on all routers sold in the US. But this parent would rather have everyone lose their rights to internet privacy so that they don’t have to do the hard work of enabling parental controls themselves.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Sure, if we are going to make sacrifices for parents then they can make sacrifices for us. How about no kids at bars or breweries, and I am allowed to hit your kids if they get within arms reach of me?

    • 1dalm@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m ok with no kids at bars and breweries. And no you can’t abuse children just to make a political point.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ok then we are back at me not giving a fuck what your kids do on the Internet.