There have to be accepted levels of risk in the world or no one can do anything. No one should drive at all, nor fly planes, ride a boat at sea, or ride a horse. No one should run any heavy machinery etc etc. The list goes on and on. But just because someone else makes bad choices, does not mean all people need to sacrifice their rights.
It is when you live in a car-centric society with an abysmal lack of accessible public transit that necessities the ability to travel by way of a personal vehicle in order to survive.
Your excuse is just as pathetic as “if you don’t like the working conditions just get a better job”. Such simple-minded, ignorant bullshit.
Explain which part of this unimplemented regulation that would require passive BAC detection is oppressing you and preventing you from driving a car made before it goes into effect
There have to be accepted levels of risk in the world or no one can do anything. No one should drive at all, nor fly planes, ride a boat at sea, or ride a horse. No one should run any heavy machinery etc etc. The list goes on and on. But just because someone else makes bad choices, does not mean all people need to sacrifice their rights.
Driving was never a right. If you don’t want a car that checks if you’re impaired then don’t buy one.
It is when you live in a car-centric society with an abysmal lack of accessible public transit that necessities the ability to travel by way of a personal vehicle in order to survive.
Your excuse is just as pathetic as “if you don’t like the working conditions just get a better job”. Such simple-minded, ignorant bullshit.
Explain which part of this unimplemented regulation that would require passive BAC detection is oppressing you and preventing you from driving a car made before it goes into effect
Do you even understand what passive bac detection entalls? Its not blowing into a device, that would be active detection.
Removed by mod
Privacy is a right.