• JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    I hate myself for remembering, and am likely wrong, but isn’t the snitch worth 150 points and ends the game? So if the opposing team was 151 points ahead catching the snitch would lose the match? I’m not going to look it up, I don’t care enough about being right in regards to Harry Potter and I’m not even sure why I commented outside of my inate need for information to be correct…

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s correct - however, 150 points is a ridiculously high number that’s almost impossible to overcome. Every time the snitch was caught, that team won the game.

        • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          This was a thing in the third book where Harry had to make sure they’re a certain number of points ahead before catching the snitch so that they’d not just win the match but also their school league.

      • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s fifteen goals. While unlikely, it’s totally possible for a team to score fifteen goals more if the skill difference is high enough and the game is allowed to go for long enough.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Is there any example of a real life sport where one play (that can only be done once per game) equals making 15 goals? That’s just bad rules.

        • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          There were some historic matches mentioned in one of the books, that apparently went on for weeks or even months, fifteen goals would be a really low number for that kind of match. The duration of a match only depends on how good the seekers are, a match can be over in five minutes which is really lame, or go on for ages which is also lame.

      • adj16@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        You’re definitely right about it being a poorly-contrived scoring system, but there are a few games in the books where the team lost the game but grabbed the snitch. It’s always described as a “stem the bleeding” type decision

        Edit: sorry, now seeing the replies to your other comments saying this, I guess you know by now 😅