• TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The project technically being independent does not mean it isn’t biased towards one browser.

        • Platform27@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can but:

          1. There is no clear indication of bias, from PrivacyTests, just accusations.
          2. If the tools and tests ARE open source (which they are), they can be checked for bias/cheating. Someone could also expand (fork) upon them to give more of a rounded opinion.
          • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A better defense against accusations of bias is a group or persons transparency.

            Simply having an open source methodology and code base isn’t transparency either, since it takes a much, much deeper and more developed skill set to audit both software source code and testing methodology than it takes to raise an eyebrow at sus circumstances.

    • Ado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay? Where is the proof it’s biased towards one browser