If the government stated you were a gang member, would that be enough evidence for you? If so, I don’t know what to tell you. If not, do you need assistance pointing out the flaw in your logic?
I can’t tell if you’re seriously arguing or if this entire thread is in bad faith, but my general policy is to approach online arguments as though the other party is being sincere. If not for you, then for anyone else who might be spectating.
The government has stated he is a gang member. That’s enough evidence for me.
The Crux of the issue is he wasn’t here legally. The reason he couldn’t be deported to El Salvador is because of his gang affiliations.
So if he isn’t a gang member then there is no reason to not to deport him to El Salvador.
If he is a gang member, we should detain him in ordain here in America.
If the government stated you were a gang member, would that be enough evidence for you? If so, I don’t know what to tell you. If not, do you need assistance pointing out the flaw in your logic?
I can’t tell if you’re seriously arguing or if this entire thread is in bad faith, but my general policy is to approach online arguments as though the other party is being sincere. If not for you, then for anyone else who might be spectating.
I’d recommend this book to help you expand your ability to think more critically. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationality_(book)
The government isn’t going to say I’m a gang member. lol. That’s a silly premise as you can’t show it happening to a legal citizens.
That’s where your argument falls flat. It’s a made up hypothetical that hasn’t and won’t happen.
Critical thinking isn’t making up a fake scenario and then pretending it’s real. That’s delusional thought.