• msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      The current technology is a dead end, and we need to go back to the drawing board with it.

      But before we can do that, we need to sell the current version, because we lost a lot of money on it…

    • Squigglez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I know Google sucks, but I will give a little credit to the newer Pixels’ “Circle to Search” feature. It’s nice to pull up an image and just circle search it and see where it came from, or the context behind it, etc etc.

      Circle Search and the two you mention are probably the only actually useful things to come out of AI so far.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      They really are! We should use tools for what they are good at and not try to cram AI into everything. Something something hammer, nail, right?

      • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yes. It’s normal human behaviour. There is a hype, then a bubble, then… normalization.

        Multimedia, keychain, blue LEDs, curved LCD screens, LLMs,… One of them is way less useful than the others.; P

    • lowspeedchase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      Summary stuff works really well too - I like to be able to bookmark a page and have tags/brief summary auto-gen’d

      • Ilixtze@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 days ago

        requiring state of the art GPU for a flesh light Is some kind of Futurama joke that i missed because I never watched Futurama.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      AI is a tool to transfer even more wealth, under the current conditions.

      GenAIs are a mistake, but corps decided to stuff billions into it, and they want their money back.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 days ago

        Sounds like “the purpose of the system is what it does.” Every invention that gets funding does that. I watched the development of ML techniques over the last decade or so; none of the researchers developing AI would have said that was the purpose. They had much loftier hopes for AI.

  • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    Like everything else since the advent of harnessing fire, it’s a double edged sword that can be used for good and evil.

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      And just because people keep hammering screws doesn’t mean hammers aren’t useful.

  • pewpew@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I used to be excited for AI advancements 3 years ago. Now the situation is just trash. Good times when generating a Godzilla farting fire on a city was fun and cool

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    While AI offers transformative potential, significant criticisms highlight its drawbacks. Current systems often perpetuate biases embedded in training data, leading to discriminatory outcomes in hiring, law enforcement, and lending. The environmental cost of training large models—like massive energy consumption and carbon emissions—raises sustainability concerns. Automation driven by AI threatens job displacement, exacerbating economic inequality, while opaque “black-box” algorithms undermine accountability in critical domains like healthcare or criminal justice. Privacy erosion, through pervasive surveillance and data exploitation, further fuels distrust. Though AI’s capabilities are impressive, its unchecked deployment risks deepening societal inequities and prioritizing efficiency over ethical considerations.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    AI sucks, but HR sent me some forms to fill in and I would rather a shitty corpospeak AI response than putting effort into answering it myself.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      19 days ago

      Nah the guy on the right understands that AI means almost anything. Hell, even the A* pathfinding algorithm falls under the realm of AI.

      • Sleepless One@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Fucking thank you! I swear way too many people think that if it ain’t Data from Star Trek, then it’s not real AI.

        • Remotedeck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          Its like these people don’t understand language changes overtime, it doesn’t matter what ai used to mean it matters what it means now

                • DesolateMood@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Society collectively when, whenever a person or company talks about AI, they’re talking about chatgpt, Gemini, deepseek, ollama, or whatever other LLM you want to substitute it for

                • Zacryon@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Scientific consensus. But it’s not “LLMs”. AI covers multitudes of methods, algorithms, models. LLMs fall into sequence modeling / prediction, usually based on transformers nowadays, which is a method from machine learning, which itself is a big branch inside of the term “AI”.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Why would SEO spammers be against it? 90% seems to be written by LLM’s already.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          Do you have no understanding of anything ever.

          Do you think good artists just magically appear

          Few artists overcharge. That’s a strawman. Most massively undercharge