• MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Damn, I was coming here to say this is a meaningful curation step and I couldn’t give Steam my usual cynical reality check, but you found the angle and now I can’t unsee it.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        It can be both. Steam wants their cut, but they also don’t want consumers seeing a free game on Steam, downloading it, and then complaining to Steam because it’s not actually free, it’s just riddled with ads.

      • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think it’s cynical. Their review model would make it very hard to make payment fair (we call always argue about whether Steam overcharges for its services) since it would be a pain in the butt to track income from advertisement.

        But the advertisement business model makes for worse games. I think it makes great sense for Steam to ban them. And if games on Steam are better then that’s good for game developers that use their platform.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      They could have made their own advertising network and force it to be used instead.

      • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They could. That takes a lot more employees than they have and would mean that they were the place with all the shitty free games.