If so, was it polled somewhere?

  • BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you’re familiar with CTH and the dirtbag left, Hexbear is where they went after being banned by Reddit.

    For what it is when lemm.ee considered de-federated from them they flooded the instance turning a 200 comment thread into 1200. And lots of harassment. Edit: In case you wanted to read that clusterbomb of a thread: https://lemm.ee/post/4543536

    • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had to look them up but yep I do remember CTH. Thanks for the answer, I’ll keep an eye out.

      • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What? There’s plenty of nonsense in there, for example:

        [https://lemm.ee/comment/2394714](also, fuck off landlord. Mao was right.)

        From the wiki:

        In this vein, Mao insisted that the people themselves, not the public security organs, should become involved in enacting the Land Reform Law and killing the landlords who had oppressed them, in contrast to the Soviet practice of dekulakization.

        … yikes. That said, it’s online bickering, there’s always going to be examples of bad behaviour.

        As for my own, unasked, opinion on hexbear. I don’t really notice them around. Maybe its because I’m blind to them as I am generally left leaning, I did by contrast notice the EH memes before they were defederated. I’m generally an all/new scroller on Lemmy.

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, no, they’re right on this one. Killing your landlord is good actually. Like literally everything else Mao did was bad, but he was right on this.

          • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m a little more reserved. I would peg my response to their attitude to change.

            If they’re willing to step aside, or even support shelter becoming a human right, then I’ve got bigger problems than them.

            If they’re going to cling tooth and nail to a system that sees people freeze and starve for their own enrichment then yeah, fuck 'em.

            • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If they’re willing to step aside, or even support shelter becoming a human right

              I mean, they could do that now. They don’t gotta wait until the knives are at their throat–though if that does happen, i expect plenty will say whatever they think will get them off the hook.

              • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean, the people who believe that landlords should be killed could do that now. They don’t gotta wait either.

                  • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    When you talk about social change via the killing of landlords being a good thing, and having knives to their throats, well the police already disagree with that. I took that as a given that you didn’t care. So they could do that now, they don’t gotta wait.

                    But here’s the point. We have established someone might not actively pursue social change that they know to be right because it would incur some personal cost, but they wouldn’t hinder it either. I’ve got less issue with them.

                    I have most issue with people who actively hinder that social change.

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I get the feeling if you learnt more about Mao you’d find a lot of things you’d want to add to your list.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anyone who downvoted the above post is free to go back to reddit. You clearly do not understand how the internet works, return to your walled garden.