• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyzOPMEnglish
      8·
      27 days ago

      Who says she’s still that age in this depiction?

      Plus, the actual anime, where she is definitely 17, shows a LOT more. If you have a problem with that, I don’t know what to tell you.

      The series is pretty explicitly about adolescent sexuality, and how it’s nothing to be ashamed of, despite how it can make you feel as you grow up. How owning it is a good thing, how confidence makes you powerful.

      If you want to make conclusions about the people who find the series appealing, that’s up to you.

      But what conclusions you came to, to consider it weird, I don’t wanna know.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyzOPMEnglish
          61·
          26 days ago

          I’ve long since given up trying to avoid characters that are “canonically underage”.

          There is no difference.

          Japanese media has a wierd insistence on characters being young, even when the story is likely to, or meant to, appeal to a wide range of ages.

          No matter how characters are depicted or written, they are always in their damn teens. And even when they aren’t, and are explicitly mature, there is little to no effective difference in the actual depiction.

          I’m not attracted to actual kids, and I’m never going to engage in any kind of sexual behaviour with anyone without consent.

          So who cares if I post art featuring characters I like? The ages of characters are almost never mentioned in the actual shows. If the characters look adult enough, and act adult enough… I’m not gonna suddenly become disgusted with myself because some writer somewhere arbitrarily picked a number below 18.

            • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyzOPMEnglish
              5·
              26 days ago

              You’re going to have to elaborate. Why?

              If you find a picture of a real adult person attractive, but I then tell you they play a 17-year-old in a movie… Do you suddenly just stop finding them attractive? Are they not, in just the same way, “effectively” a child?

              Or would you just tell me to fuck off, because it’s not like you were looking at them and feeling what you felt because of, or even despite, that.

                • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyzOPMEnglish
                  1·
                  26 days ago

                  What 17-year-old? There is no 17-year-old. It’s a fictional person. Made up. Invented. Arbitrary. Not real.

                  An actor can pretend to be any age, but a fictional figment of my imagination can be any age. You tell me she’s “canonically” a certain age, and I tell you I don’t care. That’s someone else’s imagination, not mine.

                  With a real person their age would have legal and mental implications, because you know, they’re real.

                  But with a fictional one, a character is literally whatever you think they are. It’s not like the canonical age of a charachter is somehow static and universal, so that they are their “official” age in all depictions and thoughts.

                  I’m not looking at her and imagining a child. End of story.