• enbyecho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You are speculating that SCOTUS will let some challenge slide. But it’s the constitution and SCOTUS doesn’t get to change what it says just because they are corrupt.

    “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice”

    Seems pretty crystal clear.

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Laws are not magic spells, and all the people who enforce them are his creatures.

        Demonstrably not.

        Just because we use the same rules for our violently enforced traditions of hierarchy and the physical constants of reality does not mean they’re actually the same thing.

        You are either 14 and very profound or a newly-minted graduate student. 'Cause I have no idea what you are trying to say.

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      SCOTUS has the final say on what the Constitution should mean right now. They can decide however they want. The only remedies are through the legislature (impeachment, constitutional amendments, increasing the size of the court). But if they decide something, that’s the law of the land even if it’s blatantly wrong.

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        SCOTUS has the final say on what the Constitution should mean right now. They can decide however they want.

        Not entirely. There are actually limits and checks on SCOTUS power, including the restrictions on what cases they can hear, the ability of congress to change the make up of the court and terms of appointments as well as change it’s jurisdiction.

        Now I grant it’s easy to throw up one’s hands and say “ah but that will never happen with a congress bowing and scraping to Trump” but I’d counter with two points: we can still gain majorities in the senate and house in 2026 and, crucially, if there’s one thing you can count on it’s the avaricious and rapacious nature of politicians.

        I fully expect our entire country to slide into a deep recession and for there to be complete paralyzing chaos in the federal government over the next 4 years. That threatens the status quo, meaning congress critters ability to freely grift, make money off the stock market and remain in power. They won’t like that.

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          SCOTUS has already started ignoring things like standing. I mentioned that the main check on SCOTUS is the legislature. I don’t think Congress can get its shit together long enough to effect any real check. Last term they could barely elect a speaker and this term they have even slimmer majorities. Unless the midterms are a historically large blue wave, it’s not going to matter. If a handful of defectors can kill the change, it’s not happening.